Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

[garcia2100]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Vista
* CPU : Intel core 2 duo P8400 2.27GHz
* Graphics Card : Nvidia geforce 9600m GT
* Amount of RAM : 3gb
* Sound Card : onboard


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1280x800

* Terrain :low (was on med)
* Effects : low was on med)
* Geometry : low (was on med)
* Texture : low )was on high)
* Lighting : low (was on high)
* Dynamic Shadows : low (was on high
* Dynamic Light : low (was on high)
* Anti-Aliasing : 2x
* Texture Filtering : low (was on med)



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

yes, really badly. I had everything on med to high, now i have everything on low, and its nothing but lag. for some reason i think its the new walking animations. when the soldiers walk, and the put their weapons pointing at the floor. for some reason i think that's causing some problems cause when i walk, but weapon just lags a lot.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

was at a 10. now at a 2 i would say. its as if im playing on a server with 300+ ping. everything is just choppy and slow now.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

i don't even know which to pick. first, the new ones, i **** out in all the new ones. and all the old ones which were fine now lag for me

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

anytime i see someone. especially when there's a lot of dead bodies around. i remember everything was fine while walking down a street, and when i turned the corner, the street was full of dead bodies, more than 20 maybe even 50, and my game just crapped out. i just stopped playing the game right there. this happened in coop, and the bodies were probably close to 100 dead bots. but the same problem happens when playing against other players.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

none. :'(

[dunno/be]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Win 7 Home Premium 64-bit
* CPU : Intel i7 920
* Graphics Card : HID Ati 4850
* Amount of RAM : 6Gb DDR3 1800Mhz
* Sound Card : Onboard (motherboard) I believe


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1152x864@75Hz

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : 8x
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
Awkward question, but I would say 7 on 0.9 if I would compare to a 10 in version 0.87.


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Gaza Beach, Beiroet... I didn't try the old maps yet.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Inner city.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Yamalia, Silent Eagle, Iron Ridge.

[ma21212]

Operating System : XP
CPU : P4 2 GHz
Graphics Card : ATI 9600
Amount of RAM : 1 Gig
Sound Card : err

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 800x600
Terrain : low
Effects : low
Geometry : low
Texture : low
Lighting : none
Dynamic Shadows : none
Dynamic Light : none
Anti-Aliasing : none
Texture Filtering : low


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
ALOT, even with my crappy computer i could play .87, not great but some 30 FPS on some maps. in .9 its impossible, when i look toward the center of map it goes crazy.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
2


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Berut, Silent Eagle, Iron Ridge


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Berut when i look into center, Silent Eagle, in town, Iron Ridge in the bunker next to city


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with
Kashan and qwi

[Silly_Savage]

Answers in red.

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
• CPU : Intel Core i7 950 @ 3.07GHz
• Graphics Card : 2x GTX 295 in SLI
• Amount of RAM : 3x 2GB DDR3
• Sound Card : Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1920 x 1080

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 8x
• Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza Beach, Dragon Fly, Lashkar Valley, Yamalia

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Gaza Beach: Mainly just looking towards the city, northern part specifically.

Dragon Valley: Overgrowth fields and inside the city.

Lashkar Valley: Main road running south to north, overgrowth fields, anywhere underground.

Yamalia: The marshes.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All of them except the ones listed above.

[Matainais[LV]]

ystem Specifications

* Operating System : Xp sp3 Laptop
* CPU : T6600 2.2 Ghz
* Graphics Card :GT 130M
* Amount of RAM :3 gb
* Sound Card :integrated smth


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : widescreen 1366 x 768

* Terrain : M
* Effects : M
* Geometry :H
* Texture :H
* Lighting :M
* Dynamic Shadows : M
* Dynamic Light :M
* Anti-Aliasing :O ff
* Texture Filtering :H



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Not yet, played some new maps, looks nice



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
9


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
-


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
-


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
All for now

[Wilkinson]

System Specifications

Operating System : Win 7 32-bit
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo
Graphics Card : Nvidia 9800 GSO
Amount of RAM : 4GB DDR2
Sound Card : Creative X-FI

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1280x960
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : High
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
On the newer maps yes. In an overall general perspective no.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
9


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Lakashar Valley
Beriut
Silent Eagle

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Lakashar- Looking North, rendering the Trees
Beriut- Entering City
Silent Eagle- Very rarely

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Any v0.87 Map

[McBumLuv]

System Specifications

• Operating System : Win7 Home 64
• CPU : Intel i7 920 2.66 GHz
• Graphics Card : nVidia GTX 260
• Amount of RAM : 9 Gb DDR3
• Sound Card :-

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1920x1080

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 8 (ingame, 16Q through the nVidia control panel)
• Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

6, I often still get around 40-50 fps on the old maps, but certain newer maps descend to 30 fps, or even 20 sometimes when zoomed in (such as with APCs)

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Yamalia (30 fps, unless zoomed in with 20 fps)

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Anywhere

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Qwai River

*List and last questions are WIP

[Kurt_Cower]

System Specifications
Operating System : Win XP 32 SP3.
CPU : AMD Athlon 64 X2 2.21 GHz
Graphics Card : 8600GT 256MB
Amount of RAM : 2 GB
Sound Card : Creative X-Fi Gamer.

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1280x1024
Terrain : Medium (was high before 0.9)
Effects : Medium
Geometry : Medium (was high before 0.9)
Texture : Medium (was high before 0.9)
Lighting : Medium (was high before 0.9)
Dynamic Shadows : Medium (was high before 0.9)
Dynamic Light : Medium (was high before 0.9)
Anti-Aliasing : 2x (was 4x before 0.9)
Texture Filtering : Medium (was high before 0.9)


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

YES!!!

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

4 or 5.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon Fly, Iron ridge, Silent Eagle, Gaza.

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Cities. Gaza Beach, Small town in Silent Eagle...

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Haven't played any old maps yet.

Don't forget random CTD when loading maps!

[Qwerty1216]

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows Vista
CPU : AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT (2)
Amount of RAM : 4GB
Sound Card : SoundMAX Intergreated Digital HD Audio

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1680 x 1050 @ 60hz
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : Low
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : Off
Dynamic Light : Off
Anti-Aliasing : 2X
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

3

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Fallujah West
Gaza Beach
Dragonfly

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

When i look north my FPS drops.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Every other map so far.

[Drop_Deadx]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Vista 32 bit.
* CPU : Intel Pentium.
* Graphics Card : nVidia 8600 GT.
* Amount of RAM : 2 gigs.
* Sound Card : Realtek HD.


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :

* Terrain : Medium
* Effects : Medium
* Geometry : Medium
* Texture : Medium
* Lighting : Medium
* Dynamic Shadows : Medium
* Dynamic Light : Medium
* Anti-Aliasing : 8x
* Texture Filtering : Medium



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes.



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

6



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Fallujah West, Lashkar Vally, Yamalia.



4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Fallujah West - Facing towards the city. and Yamalia - When running through the open fields.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Every map since 0.86 has been having downs.

[PlaynCool]

• Operating System : Windows 7 x64
• CPU : Some [email protected](overclockedto 3.2)
• Graphics Card : Nvidia 8800GT (overclocked)
• Amount of RAM : 2gb @ 800mhz
• Sound Card : sigmatel

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1280x1024

• Terrain : medium
• Effects :medium
• Geometry :medium
• Texture : medium
• Lighting : medium
• Dynamic Shadows :medium
• Dynamic Light :medium
• Anti-Aliasing :none
• Texture Filtering :none

Was all high now all medium still laggy, tried all low but no change at all.

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes.



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
Before 0.9 it was 9/10 now i'd say 5/10(in some places i have no problems at all but when i'm in specific areas i get some lag: the town in one of the new maps.)



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Silent Eagle(not laggy but freezes like hell)Qwai river when looking at some fields,Yamalia close to the Qanadian first objective,Gaza Beach , and Fallujah, Koregnal.



4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Yamalia the First flag on the canadian side, Silent Eagle the towns with the new statics, Gaza Beach everywhere in the city when i walk it looks like i'm teleporting and it stays 15.0 fps flat never changes.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Some of the old ones, although most of them are now rinning with 30-40fps used to be 80-100, and have freeze ups from time to time, and the load times has raised from ~1.30 min to ~3.30-4.00 min.

[RedAlertSF]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
* CPU : Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 @ 3,075GHz
* Graphics Card : GeForce 8800GTS G92
* Amount of RAM : 4GB
* Sound Card : -


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1920x1200

* Terrain : high
* Effects : high
* Geometry : high
* Texture : high
* Lighting : high
* Dynamic Shadows : high
* Dynamic Light : high
* Anti-Aliasing : 8x
* Texture Filtering : high



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
On some of the new maps.



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
Old maps = 9/10
New maps = 5/10



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Gaza Beach - almost unplayable
Yamalia - Low FPS but still playable
Beirut - sometimes low FPS but playable



4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most. on Gaza Beach, everywhere in the city, just looking at the city drops the fps. On Yamalia, the swamps. On Beirut, looking at the center of the map sometimes makes the fps to drop.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
All old maps actually
Silent Eagle
Iron Ridge

[ChuckxD]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
* CPU henon x4 955 @ 3.75(OC)
* Graphics Card :HD4890 XT(OC)
* Amount of RAM :4GB
* Sound Card :-


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1680x1050

* Terrain :high
* Effects :high
* Geometry :high
* Texture :high
* Lighting :high
* Dynamic Shadows :high
* Dynamic Light :high
* Anti-Aliasing :8x
* Texture Filtering :high



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
0.87: 9/10
0.9 : 5/10


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Gaza Beach, Yamalia and Siege at Ochamachira.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Siege at Ochamachira(on Planting Corn), Gaza Beach(looking west) e Yamalia(Zoom on any vegetation)


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Iron Ridge, Dragon Fly and Beirut (have not tested other maps)

[Nitneuc]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
* CPU : i7 920 (not O/C)
* Graphics Card :HD4870 (1Gb)
* Amount of RAM : 6GB DDR3 triple channel
* Sound Card : none


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1680x1050

* Terrain :high
* Effects :high
* Geometry :high
* Texture :high
* Lighting :high
* Dynamic Shadows :high
* Dynamic Light :high
* Anti-Aliasing :8x
* Texture Filtering :high



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Probably a loss of fps but nothing affecting the smoothness of the game.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
9.5/10


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
They seem to run fine but haven't try all of them yet.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
all seem fine AFAIK

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
all maps I tried yet (quinling, ochamira, beirut, Asad khal, Gaza, Iron ridge, Yamalia, Silent eagle)

additional comment : haven't experienced any crash even on Beirut (except server crash), I played about 8-10h by now.

[happytimes]

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows Vista 64-bit
CPU : Intel Core 2 Quad 6700 2.66GHz
Graphics Card : Nvidia 8600 GT
Amount of RAM : 4 Gb
Sound Card : Realtek High Definition Audio

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1280 X 1024
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : Medium
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : x4
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes, Especially on maps with the new vegetation (Ex.Yamalia)

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
0.87 Would be 9/10
0.9 Would be 6.5/10

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Yamalia and Lashkar Valley

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Yamalia - The open fields, Around The Benz wagon and Zooming on and scope
Lashkar - in the direction of the middle of map.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
I have played with lowered settings Changing Lighting and shadows To medium and I played on Silent Eagle and Gaza just fine. Don't know if this is from the actual map or just the lowered settings

[Zimmer]

Jaymz;1257227']System Specifications

• Operating System : Win XP 32bit
• CPU : Intel DuoCore E8400 3GHZ
• Graphics Card : Nvidia GeForce 9800GT
• Amount of RAM : 2GB
• Sound Card : Built in the mother board

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1024x768 can probably take it to 1280x1024, but its not a big deal, think I crash on dragon fly though with 1280x1024 so I play on the safe side.

• Terrain : High
• Effects :High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : Medium
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows :High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 8x
• Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes not so much on the few old maps I have played, Qwai and Fallujah but I get a FPS dump when I look at the middle in Fallujah though I didnt get a memory glitch even with teextures on high. I had to take down texture to medium to play maps as dragon fly that sadens me.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

On most maps it has worked okay aslong as I have those settings.
7 for new against 9 for 0.87

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Fallujah, Dragon Fly I think I had some problems with scoping on Beirut but not in Yamalia.

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Looking at the middle makes the FPS god down significant in nearly all the militai maps it if I see another way it can be as high as 99 fps but when looking at the middle it will go down to 60-40 40 if its a town or city I am in.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Most of the old maps works fin from what I have tested, no need to set down the graphics with those maps.

[Garmax]

System Specifications

* Operating System : 64 Bit Windows 7 Ultimate
* CPU : AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core 2.20Ghz
* Graphics Card :
* Amount of RAM : 3.00 GB
* Sound Card :


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1680 x 1050

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : x6
* Texture Filtering : the highest



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes, very laggy almost unplayable? takes the fun out.....



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

before in .87 i was at 10, now 6 maybe..


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

most new maps

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

very choppy, laggy low FPS specially during gun fights


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

mutrahh i noticed little lag

[bad_nade]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 64-bit
* CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.4 GHz
* Graphics Card : EVGA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
* Amount of RAM : 8 GB DDR2 800 MHz
* Sound Card : Razer Barracuda AC-1


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1920x1200@60 Hz

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : 8x
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
7


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
* Fallujah West
* Lashkar Valley
* Korengal Valley

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Anywhere where there is lots of activity (20-30 players or more in the same area)


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
N/A

[galeknight1]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 32 Bit
* CPU : AMD Turion Dual-Core RM-72 ~2.1GHz
* Graphics Card : Nvidia Geforce 8200M G
* Amount of RAM : 4GB DDR2
* Sound Card : (Not Sure)


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1024x768 (No difference 800x600)

* Terrain : Medium (No difference Low)
* Effects : Low
* Geometry : Low
* Texture : Medium (No difference Low)
* Lighting : Low
* Dynamic Shadows : Low
* Dynamic Light : Low
* Anti-Aliasing : Off
* Texture Filtering : Low



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Only on new maps.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
0.87 - 9
0.9 - 9 on old maps, 3 on new



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Every new map that I've tried + Korengal. (Excludes Silent Eagle & Beirut.)

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

In Iron Ridge the forest has bad lag while the building areas are alright, while in Dragonfly the city had horrible lag and the forest is okay. Lashkar lags most of the time, and the others I can't really put my finger on specific places.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Every single map from 0.87 besides Korengal Valley, even the altered ones like Fallujah.

EDIT: Note that I am normally running at 40fps, which I consider avarage. When I say lag I mean about 5-10fps.

[eenis]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows 7
CPU : AMD Quad core 2.6ghz OC'd to 2.8ghz
Graphics Card : gtx295
Amount of RAM : 8gb 800hz
Sound Card : na

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : high
Terrain : high
Effects : high
Geometry : high
Texture :
Lighting : high
Dynamic Shadows : high
Dynamic Light : high
Anti-Aliasing : off
Texture Filtering : high


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

yes, i had to turn off AA from 8x

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8.5

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

city maps

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

i get a little choppy when looking at buildings in a city, usually the moddable PR buildings that you guys added

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
non city maps, like silent eagel, iron ridge etc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------