Pics of Myself

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Logue
Posts: 86
Joined: 2005-03-30 21:51

Post by Logue »

at a distance it works quite well but the closer you get to see the boxes the more odd it looks
No army unbeatable, no ship unsinkable, no life expendable.
Archangel
Posts: 202
Joined: 2004-09-24 22:50

Post by Archangel »

Well the further you get from anything the less of a chance you will have to see it anyway.
Image
Sh0rtbUs
Posts: 157
Joined: 2005-03-29 00:01

Post by Sh0rtbUs »

Beckwith wrote:im not thrilled with the US Army's choice of digital camo every one says its great and itll blend into woodland or desert i look at it and dont really buy it
Well speaking as someone who has personally used the old Vietnam OD (Olive Draps), and CADPAT..I can say CADPAT is much better.

As well, concerning the comment on how it looks. For one, kit isnt made to look cool, it's made to work. I've personally had U.S. National Guardsman stand over me while they conversed...without being detected. I highly doubt our older Camo would have faired as well...

Image

Image

I'm not sure about you, but it seems to blend fairly well to me.

Note: When i reference CADPAT, I'm actually referencing the MARPAT as well. Naturally, im just used to aying CADPAT CADPAT CADPAT CADPAT :roll:
Beckwith
Posts: 1341
Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00

Post by Beckwith »

Sh0rtbUs wrote:
Beckwith wrote:im not thrilled with the US Army's choice of digital camo every one says its great and itll blend into woodland or desert i look at it and dont really buy it
Well speaking as someone who has personally used the old Vietnam OD (Olive Draps), and CADPAT..I can say CADPAT is much better.

As well, concerning the comment on how it looks. For one, kit isnt made to look cool, it's made to work. I've personally had U.S. National Guardsman stand over me while they conversed...without being detected. I highly doubt our older Camo would have faired as well...

Image

Image

I'm not sure about you, but it seems to blend fairly well to me.

Note: When i reference CADPAT, I'm actually referencing the MARPAT as well. Naturally, im just used to aying CADPAT CADPAT CADPAT CADPAT :roll:
i agree 100% about CADPAT and MARPAT those work well because there actually green where as the army one is blue

Image

for some reason they think this can blend into jungle and desert im not so sure
Image

Image
Sh0rtbUs
Posts: 157
Joined: 2005-03-29 00:01

Post by Sh0rtbUs »

Not to mention the half-assed OD name tags/Chevrons etc.
Beckwith
Posts: 1341
Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00

Post by Beckwith »

yea but there not actually sticked on all that stuffs velcro'd dont ask me why :roll:

but seriously am i the only one that doesnt understand how the color scheme could blend into anything?
Image

Image
requiem
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3651
Joined: 2004-07-22 16:00

Post by requiem »

Beckwith
Posts: 1341
Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00

Post by Beckwith »

heres the camo they should use
http://www.multicampattern.com/IMAGES.htm
Image

Image
requiem
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3651
Joined: 2004-07-22 16:00

Post by requiem »

Beckwith wrote:heres the camo they should use
http://www.multicampattern.com/IMAGES.htm
I love the 1st image, how they compare to woodland, yet it's not a woodland environment :)
Sh0rtbUs
Posts: 157
Joined: 2005-03-29 00:01

Post by Sh0rtbUs »

requiem wrote:
Beckwith wrote:heres the camo they should use
http://www.multicampattern.com/IMAGES.htm
I love the 1st image, how they compare to woodland, yet it's not a woodland environment :)
I noticed that too :lol:
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”