Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

SShadowFox · Post by **SShadowFox** » 2012-12-14 11:29

[R-DEV]AncientMan wrote:No. Performance should slightly better even.

My computer approves this.

Phoenixo_Idaho · Post by **Phoenixo_Idaho** » 2012-12-14 12:16

[R-CON]rodrigoma wrote:Well that's an easy wish to fulfill

Well you're right but i haven't time to put in it instead TESTING (Job far from home)

Post by **Arab** » 2012-12-14 12:59

The quality looks much more crisp and quality! Is it a new anti-aliasing option (forced) or improved textures or both?

risegold8929 · Post by **risegold8929** » 2012-12-15 07:54

[R-DEV]AncientMan wrote:No. Performance should slightly better even.

Best news I have heard for a long time.

ShockUnitBlack · Post by **ShockUnitBlack** » 2012-12-15 08:03

Arab wrote:The quality looks much more crisp and quality! Is it a new anti-aliasing option (forced) or improved textures or both?

To my knowledge the devs use extremely high levels of forced texture filtering when taking promotional screens and video.

Post by **AncientMan** » 2012-12-15 08:44

ShockUnitBlack wrote:To my knowledge the devs use extremely high levels of forced texture filtering when taking promotional screens and video.

There are also several new post processing shaders in 1.0 (created by me, shameless self promotion

), once of which is an unsharp filter to sharpen edges a bit more than normal

.

Heavy Death · Post by **Heavy Death** » 2012-12-15 09:19

[R-DEV]AncientMan wrote:an unsharp filter to sharpen edges a bit more

Post by **AncientMan** » 2012-12-15 09:34

Unsharp masking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ShockUnitBlack · Post by **ShockUnitBlack** » 2012-12-15 19:22

[R-DEV]AncientMan wrote:There are also several new post processing shaders in 1.0 (created by me, shameless self promotion ), once of which is an unsharp filter to sharpen edges a bit more than normal .

Yes. Yes! Yes!! Yes!!!

Une question: is stuff still being added to the v1.0 build or is it all bug fixes at the moment?

Post by **Adriaan** » 2012-12-15 19:36

ShockUnitBlack wrote:Une question: is stuff still being added to the v1.0 build or is it all bug fixes at the moment?

Lots of stuff to add and being added still

xambone · Post by **xambone** » 2012-12-17 02:31

No 128 man support? is this because of issues with PB ?

p.s. Your moms a magic 8-ball

ShockUnitBlack · Post by **ShockUnitBlack** » 2012-12-23 03:16

Any chance that we'll see jungle like this in v1.0?

Doc.Pock · Post by **Doc.Pock** » 2012-12-23 19:00

any devblogs coming?

AnA10Warthog · Post by **AnA10Warthog** » 2012-12-23 19:08

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:To worship our greatness and to play Project Reality constantly!

I was expecting '42'...

Post by **AfterDune** » 2012-12-23 19:17

'[USF wrote:Doc.Pock;1846368']any devblogs coming?

Yep!

Pvt.LHeureux · Post by **Pvt.LHeureux** » 2012-12-23 19:23

'[USF wrote:Doc.Pock;1846368']any devblogs coming?

BloodyDeed said a Devcast was coming soon and that it is awesome

Rabbit · Post by **Rabbit** » 2012-12-23 19:34

Dear devs,

Will we ever see a Russian counter part to the UH-60, or lynx like the ka-60?

WeeD-KilleR · Post by **WeeD-KilleR** » 2012-12-23 19:49

Dear devs,
will the Bundeswehr get some love? It's a part of the mod for so long now but so far only 2 maps with it. Also what about vehicle? I kinda wish I could see the Wiesel in it's different varients ingame.

Kothra · Post by **Kothra** » 2012-12-23 20:20

WeeD-KilleR wrote:Dear devs,
will the Bundeswehr get some love? It's a part of the mod for so long now but so far only 2 maps with it. Also what about vehicle? I kinda wish I could see the Wiesel in it's different varients ingame.

What about the Dingo 2 or the Fuchs?

Doc.Pock · Post by **Doc.Pock** » 2012-12-23 20:27

fuchs is in making by someone. check community modding.

DEVS GET DAT DEVCAST OUT NOW!

Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]'s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)