Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

JackONeill · Post by **JackONeill** » 2013-07-26 16:32

Microwaife wrote:And a new class. The dog, a companion you truly care about.

I want my MOCAP-dog!

=Romagnolo= · Post by **=Romagnolo=** » 2013-07-26 16:34

[R-DEV]Spush wrote:A lot.

Go on...

smgunsftw · Post by **smgunsftw** » 2013-07-26 16:37

[R-CON]Psyrus wrote:I've never understood why people jizz themselves over destructable environments... especially given that most destructible environments are either pre-scripted or rather 'blocky' at best, and generally don't change the face of the battle much past aesthetically. Is there a specific reason you'd be interested in the destruction?

Makes it a lot more realistic when vehicles are engaging infantry or other small targets behind walls. I mean, a concert wall shouldn't be able to deflect/block a 125mm HEAT round.

Post by **camo** » 2013-07-26 17:11

[R-DEV]BloodyDeed wrote:Afterdune is obviously trolling.

Is the dingo going to be implemented into the German forces in 1.0 since you have it as your sig?

WarEagle751 · Post by **WarEagle751** » 2013-07-26 18:03

smgunsftw wrote:Makes it a lot more realistic when vehicles are engaging infantry or other small targets behind walls. I mean, a concert wall shouldn't be able to deflect/block a 125mm HEAT round.

That is exactly my point. Infantry like snipers would now have to be more careful and not rely on walls and building as much like in real life.

Seraph · Post by **Seraph** » 2013-07-26 18:13

camo_jnr_jnr wrote:
[R-DEV]BloodyDeed;1921832 wrote:Afterdune is obviously trolling.
Is the dingo going to be implemented into the German forces in 1.0 since you have it as your sig?

lol, turns out we used the same pic.

Post by **-=anders=-** » 2013-07-26 18:21

notmyingamename wrote:what's the one feature you guys wish that you could implement but never found a way to make functional?

not fastrope necessarily, but even something game changing we aren't aware of

Not a big deal, but 1p and 3p stationary weapon reload animations.
Support more memory than 4GB for better performance and higher texture resolutions. Handle more sounds at once in Hardware mode.

spawncaptain · Post by **spawncaptain** » 2013-07-26 23:15

[R-CON]Psyrus wrote:I've never understood why people jizz themselves over destructable environments... especially given that most destructible environments are either pre-scripted or rather 'blocky' at best, and generally don't change the face of the battle much past aesthetically. Is there a specific reason you'd be interested in the destruction?

Artillery cannot be used to level buildings used for cover in PR. Now don't say ROE.

Post by **KaB** » 2013-07-27 09:44

Destroying buildings should make the players losing points.

And in INS, coalition team would lose intel points as well.

Post by **K4on** » 2013-07-27 11:37

no army loses points in syria for destroying buildings

Post by **KaB** » 2013-07-27 11:41

[R-DEV]K4on wrote:no army loses points in syria for destroying buildings

Nor for killing civilians I guess.

smgunsftw · Post by **smgunsftw** » 2013-07-27 12:34

Wait, so are we going to get fully destructible maps in the future? Or are there too many limitations with the engine to do so?

Cossack · Post by **Cossack** » 2013-07-27 12:42

Its discussed to death - want destructible maps - buy mainframe to run it.

lucky.BOY · Post by **lucky.BOY** » 2013-07-27 12:43

Kashan is pretty much fully destructible. Is it the pinnacle of pr game experience? I wouldnt say so.

Post by **Rudd** » 2013-07-27 13:09

smgunsftw wrote:Wait, so are we going to get fully destructible maps in the future? Or are there too many limitations with the engine to do so?

maps have a limit on objects that are networkable, if you go over that limit...the map simply crashes.

Destructible buildings can be fun and I hope we keep a selection of destructible objects around, however they 1) make crashes more likely as above, 2) are more complex objects eating performance, 3) need extra lightmap files which increase the strain on your RAM.

PricelineNegotiator · Post by **PricelineNegotiator** » 2013-07-28 12:42

I was thinking about this earlier today, but what if the feature that the devs are waiting on for release is fastropes? THAT'S WHY THEY CAN'T REVEAL IT.

Post by **melonmuncher** » 2013-07-28 12:49

PricelineNegotiator wrote:I was thinking about this earlier today, but what if the feature that the devs are waiting on for release is fastropes? THAT'S WHY THEY CAN'T REVEAL IT.

N-no that's ridiculous... It's been said multiple times that fastropes are impossible, and it's not like [R-DEVS] are notorious liars or anything, right?

ComradeHX · Post by **ComradeHX** » 2013-07-28 13:56

Are fast ropes going to be in? huehuehue

Is there a way for specialist to throw a rope that can hook onto the chopper he is on(assuming it is stable) so people can press E to get out, then E again to grab the rope hopefully before they fall?

Post by **AfterDune** » 2013-07-28 14:00

Grappling hooks only stick to statics.

Post by **Rhino** » 2013-07-28 14:03

ComradeHX wrote:Are fast ropes going to be in? huehuehue

Is there a way for specialist to throw a rope that can hook onto the chopper he is on(assuming it is stable) so people can press E to get out, then E again to grab the rope hopefully before they fall?

Even if we could sort out the rope bit, there is a pretty large delay on how soon you can enter a vehicle after exiting one, which would mean you would most likley hit the ground before catching the rope, again, assuming we did get the rope bit to work....

Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)