Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post Reply
FlOwMaKeRs
Posts: 85
Joined: 2016-03-14 19:41

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by FlOwMaKeRs »

Not Totally agree but, I think there should be more PR modes.

People take skirmish as a joke.
bromley
Posts: 461
Joined: 2009-07-11 22:44

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by bromley »

I feel like infantry layers for ANY map are the same. They really serve no purpose and are never played
Ratface
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 962
Joined: 2011-04-21 18:57

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by Ratface »

Most of the time skirmish maps are either used for small clan battles or as 1st map rotation choices since they don't last long.

Better to have a fast map if you have a server crash than trying to seed with a larger or slower paced map imo. You don't really see em in many other spots, but I don't see a problem with that.
PLODDITHANLEY
Posts: 3608
Joined: 2009-05-02 19:44

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by PLODDITHANLEY »

I enjoy them from time to time, yes they are run die respawn, repeat but for me it's the same as squad at its present state of development.
Image
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by Rabbit »

I like them a lot. Some are made for clan battles, like sbenehs smallest skirm layer is really 16v16 max while Shija skirm standard layer can be a lot of fun for around 32v32. It provides a moderately large area with no vehicles and is a great seeder for servers that are only about 25%-50% filled.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
SANGUE-RUIM
Posts: 1390
Joined: 2009-04-26 12:37

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by SANGUE-RUIM »

Skirmish is very fun... for a short time...

don't see any problem with that
solidfire93
Posts: 491
Joined: 2015-06-26 14:21

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by solidfire93 »

good for seeding or after server crash....

i dont see anything wrong with it and no one should take it seriously...

when playing this mode. lmao
Steeps
Posts: 1994
Joined: 2011-08-15 15:58

Post by Steeps »

bromley wrote:I feel like infantry layers for ANY map are the same. They really serve no purpose and are never played

I smell an armor or CAS whore.

Infantry layers are the best. If you say they have no purpose, you're obviously bad at infantry.
Image


Image
eversmen_br
Posts: 60
Joined: 2014-01-16 17:43

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by eversmen_br »

That is one thing that bothers me on pr , if you have few players there is not much to do but skirmish, and it fells to much like you cod or your run of the mill vanila bf .

Maybe revamp skirmish and create a more engaging layout for small number of players.

I think small objectives could be add, mixing up with flag captures, like cache , or some other game object like ( destroy supply truck static, comms , get intel. + 1km map with car support, protect a static npc on determined area.

Doing this even small servers could strive...i think it's time for pr to dominate the small battlefields : D
Last edited by eversmen_br on 2016-03-23 13:28, edited 4 times in total.
Brozef
Posts: 213
Joined: 2015-03-27 02:51

Re: Skirmish Maps are not PR

Post by Brozef »

Learn to work with your team and forget the Asset whoring :)
Post Reply

Return to “Maps”