"But in real life..."

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
joemoemino
Posts: 35
Joined: 2005-08-15 02:01

Post by joemoemino »

That would be awesome. Like you tap reload and it does a faster reload and holding reload key down keeps the older mag and puts in a new one.
GABBA
Posts: 633
Joined: 2005-05-16 16:00

Post by GABBA »

"in real life" one cannot fire a m203 at the floor 3 metres away and expect to live
"Incoming fire has the rigth of way"...........

"never share a foxhole with anyone braver than you are"
TerribleOne
Posts: 586
Joined: 2005-06-26 16:00

Post by TerribleOne »

i like the idea of keeping your mags. mabe when you press r you can switch between your mags. Since soldiers do not throw away there mags anyway they put them back where they got them when they were full.

"hmm shit i got 12 in that one 1 in this one and 30 in this one :D "
Image
Djuice
Posts: 310
Joined: 2005-07-24 16:00

Post by Djuice »

GABBA wrote:"in real life" one cannot fire a m203 at the floor 3 metres away and expect to live
lol, in real life the grenade wont even detonate, it would just bounce along the floor. :P
TerribleOne
Posts: 586
Joined: 2005-06-26 16:00

Post by TerribleOne »

It will if i fired it in the air and then it lands 3 metres in front of me 8)
Image
Hawlsey
Posts: 6
Joined: 2005-08-17 20:52

Post by Hawlsey »

I think this mod has really helped this game. I know several of my friends (myself, as well) can't really enjoy the standard game anymore! This has really fixed many of the more glaring issues I've had with this game since release.

One concern... the M249 seems to have a bit too much recoil. Is it just me that feels this way? And no, I'm not completely ignorant on the subject. Not that it really is all that big of a deal... just the only thing I can find to "complain" about :)
Wolfmaster
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4927
Joined: 2004-09-05 16:00

Post by Wolfmaster »

yes, the recoil is a bit too much. shame i chose the heavier machine gun as first unlock...
Image
Djuice
Posts: 310
Joined: 2005-07-24 16:00

Post by Djuice »

TerribleOne wrote:It will if i fired it in the air and then it lands 3 metres in front of me 8)
hehe, its wont fall 3 metres infront of you, its would detonate probably 20m above you, as they have a 14-17sec fuze self destruct :P

Actually for the M249 the recoil is supposed to be less then the other LMGs well according to the code, or maybe its just that the M249 has a smaller aiming ironsight (small like hole) compared to the other LMGs, thats why its seems harder to control/aim with it.
Image
requiem
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3651
Joined: 2004-07-22 16:00

Post by requiem »

Artnez.com wrote: Snipers are supposed to take out high priority targets.
This is not the case anymore, esp. in urban warfare. Refer to http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,1 ... 05.00.html , or just search the news pages for other cases that resemble these tactics.
GABBA
Posts: 633
Joined: 2005-05-16 16:00

Post by GABBA »

That's what i wish bf2 had. The m203 safety device thing (what juice was talking about). That will put an end to those m203 troll's.
"Incoming fire has the rigth of way"...........

"never share a foxhole with anyone braver than you are"
MjauingtoN
Posts: 10
Joined: 2005-08-24 17:46

Post by MjauingtoN »

The M203 dont got any fuze... It is like a clock that rotates.. and bla bla.. :) but if you ever used one you know :)

also when you fire the AT weapons there is a blackblast that goes at least 10 meters behind the gunner if it is a CS grenade that is used.
If you fire a AT4 with standard ammo you have a backblast that is well over 17 meters.. Fire that inside a room and you are dead.
It is not possible to fire inside rooms because of the blackblast.
This would be cool if it could be fixed.
there can be no victory if there is no survival
Beckwith
Posts: 1341
Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00

Post by Beckwith »

the AT rocket for the US is not the at4 its the Preadator which i believe was designed to be fired fired from more confined spaces
Image

Image
gnwbumblino
Posts: 85
Joined: 2005-08-22 11:35

Post by gnwbumblino »

Beckwith wrote:again id say my suggestion is the most realistic way to do it at least that i can think of

A. every soldier carries 2 tourniquets which just stop the bleeding
B medics carry some sort of real medicine or animate them giving stitches which actually give the health back

Awesome idea.

:arrow: Someone gonna crank up a Poll for Beck's idea???

Sounds like a great compromise.
Djuice
Posts: 310
Joined: 2005-07-24 16:00

Post by Djuice »

MjauingtoN wrote:The M203 dont got any fuze... It is like a clock that rotates.. and bla bla.. :) but if you ever used one you know :)

also when you fire the AT weapons there is a blackblast that goes at least 10 meters behind the gunner if it is a CS grenade that is used.
If you fire a AT4 with standard ammo you have a backblast that is well over 17 meters.. Fire that inside a room and you are dead.
It is not possible to fire inside rooms because of the blackblast.
This would be cool if it could be fixed.
Well if the 40mm doesnt have a fuze, then how the hell does it detonate? :P

the SRAAW (Predator) has soft launch capability, meaning it can be fired from confined places, like inside a building.
Image
Tacamo
Posts: 602
Joined: 2004-07-24 14:10

Post by Tacamo »

All we need now are some AT rockets with a novel explosive warhead. Does wonders for stiff resistance in confined spaces.
Djuice
Posts: 310
Joined: 2005-07-24 16:00

Post by Djuice »

What we really need are unguided AT Rockets.. To make vehicles survive longer, all those guided ATGMs ownzor all the vehicles in the game and practically makes then useless, they can even take out helicopters.

Just need some RPG-7V, Carl Gustavs, Type 69, M136 AT-4, NLAW MBT-2000
Image
Beckwith
Posts: 1341
Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00

Post by Beckwith »

i wanna see milans and jevelins i dont care if there guided or not so long as there 1shot-1kill
Image

Image
BrokenArrow
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3071
Joined: 2005-06-07 18:54

Post by BrokenArrow »

id go for unguided weapons, that way the vehicles can actually do something in a fight.
Image
Djuice
Posts: 310
Joined: 2005-07-24 16:00

Post by Djuice »

hehe, Slamming a SRAAW up a tank arse 300m away is totally evil..
Image
joemoemino
Posts: 35
Joined: 2005-08-15 02:01

Post by joemoemino »

the m203 is a contact type deal, it arms after flying 15 meters. anything closer than that it wont blow.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”