[Weapon] HK416 [wip]

KP · Post by KP » 2007-06-29 09:18

AN/PEQ-2 on the right side of the weapon:

The big question now is, of course, M203 or vertical grip?

robbo · Post by **robbo** » 2007-06-29 10:14

Do 2 models one with 203' and one with vert grip

wow that PEQ looks sweet as man we need this in PR.

A little help accessory wise

Bobs gonna cry when he sees the amount of rails and rail accessories.

KP · Post by KP » 2007-06-29 10:23

Oh my God. Let's whack on a 100rd drum mag while we're at it, shall we?

sekiryu · Post by **sekiryu** » 2007-06-29 14:20

If you're going to put a GL on an HK416, it has to be the HK one.

Teek · Post by **Teek** » 2007-06-29 19:52

use the Surefire Foregrip W/Light.
How about the second stock the M~g~ul CTR or whatever stock
oh, what about some Mag pulls?

Post by **requiem** » 2007-06-29 22:02

You've gotta even out the distribution of tri's. You've put a ton in the rails although the sight is what's really in your face when you're playing (and it's looking very low poly). Apart from that minor proportion errors (i.e. foregrip). Can we see a wire? Cheers

KP · Post by KP » 2007-06-29 22:17

Correct as always.
I forgot to mention that this is not a model that's going to end up in the game. It's simply a way for me to experiment a little, work on some techniques, try some new stuff and generally messing around (I'm actually having a laugh making the thing, always wondering what else I can whack on there to make it look even more 1337 and utterly, utterly silly). If I was going for an in-game model, I'd obviously have increased the poly count on the Aimpoint and sodded the rails, and generally paid more attention to poly count (it's about 5000 triangles right now, if memory serves) and poly distribution.

And a quick wireframe screenie for ya:

Oh, and BTW: the proportions match the reference pics I've got, so unless the pics are off, it's probably the angle of the render that screws the proportions up...

tele-loe- · Post by **tele-loe-** » 2007-07-01 03:52

Great job.

Griffon2-6 · Post by **Griffon2-6** » 2007-07-01 13:30

No, the size is correct, it's just too far from the mag. But I guess you can install it there in real life.

KP · Post by KP » 2007-07-01 13:42

You can put it wherever you like; that's an advantage with the RIS. It depends on how long your arms are.

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-07-01 14:32

Looks really good.
I'm making one for fun, too.

T4nn13 · Post by **T4nn13** » 2007-07-01 18:29

Nice one man!
But to be honest, the 416 would look superbe with Iron Sights!

Lampshade111 · Post by **Lampshade111** » 2007-07-01 20:10

They need to find a way to add a rail interface system to a weapon without making the whole gun look bad.

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-07-01 20:16

Who cares about the look in combat? lol

KP · Post by KP » 2007-07-01 20:22

Well, you know, the whole rail thing...is like, so last year.

T4nn13 wrote:Nice one man!
But to be honest, the 416 would look superbe with Iron Sights!

Indeed, but then I wouldn't be able to add the most possible silly little gadgets, would I?

robbo · Post by **robbo** » 2007-07-01 23:50

Maybe a tactical spoon a surefire water dispenser

and a PR count down to v0.6 clock

KP · Post by KP » 2007-07-04 00:50

Did someone say Magpul CTR buttstock?

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-07-04 03:51

nop, nobody say Magpul CTR buttstock .

but its look great btw

KP · Post by KP » 2007-07-04 08:45

Yes, someone did say it:

Teek wrote:How about the second stock the M~g~ul CTR or whatever stock