certain equipment or vehicles depending on the map, and other suggestion

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Post Reply
Fernavliz
Posts: 15
Joined: 2007-07-28 20:34

certain equipment or vehicles depending on the map, and other suggestion

Post by Fernavliz »

what about adding certain equipment or vehicles depending on the map and its location.

Like for example, a map that is located in saudi arabia where the MEC fights US coalition; give MEC some m1 abrams tanks because saudi arabia owns some of these tanks (i read about it somewhere). I know that the MEC would make like a general equipment for all their army but there are useful things, like m1 abrams tanks, that are owned by only some MEC countries (saudi arabia, egypt, kuwait) of the and no by all the other MEC (so their main tank is t-90 but with m1 abrams like secundary tank, at least on that map). And the same if the map is located in a MEC country with many useful vehicles, weapons, combat jets, etc different than the standart MEC (maybe the uniforms if it is different and that country´s army are very numerous, like iranians).


other suggestion (I think it is really unnesesary):
I´ve read that the MEC faction isn´t realistic enough for some players because it doesn´t represent (phisicaly :? :, languaje) countries like iran or afganistan that forms part of the MEC. I suggest to make a different a player model for the MEC that would look like "from a persian country"(iran, afganistan), this would replace the base rifleman kit or other base kit, so it would represent the irani´s soldiers in the MEC. Just a (dump) suggestion, what do you think?

(sorry for my english)
PlatinumA1
Posts: 381
Joined: 2007-06-25 07:31

Post by PlatinumA1 »

yah i just did a search , they have some m1 abrams


edit: not their mbt
Cp
Posts: 2225
Joined: 2006-04-17 18:21

Post by Cp »

Right now the T-90 is a mirror image of the m1a2 so I cant see the point of having 2 diffrent tanks on the same map and team with the exact same stats. BUT if in the future the T-90s lets say gets weaker than the abrams then I can see your point.

Ignore the ones saying the MEC faction is unrealistic, if we were totaly realistic then we would only have UK vs insurgents and US vs insurgents. but different skins would be nice, all MEC troops look like clones with diffrent Hats
El_Vikingo
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50

Post by El_Vikingo »

It's up to the mapper to choose what vehicles go on their maps.

What I thought the thread was about was having a vehicle, such as the land rover have a 50.cal on one map and a nade launcher on another one.
Image

If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.
BetterDeadThanRed
Posts: 1728
Joined: 2007-02-12 02:30

Post by BetterDeadThanRed »

I like that idea better.
ImageLeMazing.
ShowMeTheMonkey
Posts: 33
Joined: 2007-02-11 21:22

Post by ShowMeTheMonkey »

Such as this one that the Royal Marines got for their Xmas present in 2006?

Image

Look at their smily faces!
Image
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

El_Vikingo wrote:It's up to the mapper to choose what vehicles go on their maps.

What I thought the thread was about was having a vehicle, such as the land rover have a 50.cal on one map and a nade launcher on another one.

i sugest that a while ago .

adding variety to vehicles , for example , having a cobra armed with 16 hellfires in one armor map , and a cobra armed with 8 tows and 2 pod of hydras in a inf map .
El_Vikingo
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50

Post by El_Vikingo »

That would be much better than giving the opposite team the same vehicle.
Image

If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.
Paladin-X
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 592
Joined: 2005-06-12 16:00

Post by Paladin-X »

Cp20000 wrote:Right now the T-90 is a mirror image of the m1a2...
In what way?
Image
Image
Bob_Marley
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7745
Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39

Post by Bob_Marley »

Well actually, its not, as the T-90 doesn't suck ingame compared with other armor.

It doesn't have nearly as many "sweet spots" as the M1 and is slightly smaller, iirc.
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Image
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”