M16A4...handguard to thick?

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2008-01-01 01:02

Title says it all. I was wondering maybe it should be a little thiner.

Anyone think so too?

Post by **bosco_** » 2008-01-01 01:03

Do you have any idea of how long it would take to redo it?

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2008-01-01 01:14

[R-PUB]bosco wrote:Do you have any idea of how long it would take to redo it?

No but thats not the issue right now. I noticed this when i first played(LAN) and then i went on the internet and compared some pictures. The main thing i think that makes it look big is the size of the players hand compared to the M16.

BTW in case i named it wrong im talking about the part around the barrel that the shooter would put his hand on when holding the rifle.

jayceon515 · Post by **jayceon515** » 2008-01-01 01:33

ironcomatose wrote:Title says it all. I was wondering maybe it should be a little thiner.

Anyone think so too?

Why are you always bitching about everything? Try to do something by yourself and you'll see it ain't that easy

Post by **Cheeseman** » 2008-01-01 01:49

I don't think the handguard is too thick, if anything it's too thin.
Hers an example:

In other words the handguard looks fine.

Dragonfire43560 · Post by **Dragonfire43560** » 2008-01-01 01:50

Wow guys chill out at leat he is pointing out what flaws are in this game. It still is up to the devs whether fix it or not.

Jedimushroom · Post by **Jedimushroom** » 2008-01-01 02:13

The only thing I don't like about it is the texture flipped writing that says born to kill backwards on one side.

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2008-01-01 02:15

jayceon515 wrote:Why are you always bitching about everything? Try to do something by yourself and you'll see it ain't that easy

Who the hell are you? I asked a simple question.

Thanks to the guys who responded well. And i still dont know. I feel like the "players hand" cant even wrap around it fully(still a sexy model).

3===SPECTER===3 · Post by **3===SPECTER===3** » 2008-01-01 02:20

jayceon515 wrote:Why are you always bitching about everything? Try to do something by yourself and you'll see it ain't that easy

I agree with iron. Its a simple question no need to bash him about.

Zybon · Post by **Zybon** » 2008-01-01 02:29

Yes, this is the very first thing I thought when I picked it up from some guy.

Spaz · Post by **Spaz** » 2008-01-01 02:31

At first it looked to thick, but i found some pics on goolge and its the right size

BAH cheeseman was to fast

Post by **Nickbond592** » 2008-01-01 02:32

it correct

DavidP · Post by **DavidP** » 2008-01-01 02:43

Damn you! Stop making me jealous! Whats next showing me the Acog version? Or what you see through the scope?

Blackhawk 5 · Post by **Blackhawk 5** » 2008-01-01 02:55

Only thing about the M16 I wish is some attachments, mabye a Front grip, or a PEQ box, otherwise those RIS/RAS rails are uselss, except the dust covers, but nontheless its still a great addition.

Rambo Hunter · Post by **Rambo Hunter** » 2008-01-01 02:59

The handguard looks fine to me. If anything, the carry handle looks a bit too thick.

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2008-01-01 03:15

Hmmm...ok then i will take you guys word for it. Maybe im just to used to the crappy M16A2 model

WeeGeez · Post by **WeeGeez** » 2008-01-01 03:47

3===SPECTER===3 wrote:I agree with iron. Its a simple question no need to bash him about.

me three

Objurium · Post by **Objurium** » 2008-01-01 06:30

I think you guys are used to seeing normal M16 handguards, and not the RIS with rail panels. They're pretty beefy.

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2008-01-01 06:39

Objurium wrote:I think you guys are used to seeing normal M16 handguards, and not the RIS with rail panels. They're pretty beefy.

Yep thats the feeling im starting to get.

Lock this thread?