Delay when entering .50 cal in Jeeps

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Post Reply
Doom721
Posts: 503
Joined: 2006-07-30 13:32

Delay when entering .50 cal in Jeeps

Post by Doom721 »

A small suggestion but one that I think needs to adressed.

The suggestion:

A 3 second delay when entering the mounted machine guns on light jeeps to prevent tactics such as driving like a madman, hitting F2 and jumping on the turret immediately.

Something similar to the tank delay but very short, just enough to make it not be a drive-50 cal-drive away moment

I use this tactic currently, and it feels dirty.... just hoping it changes in the future!
Image
"FAIL" - Right after you drive on the grass in Gran Turismo 4
Playing PR since Halo dropping spec ops and SL spawn ;) ( .3 :razz: )
Proud Member of the ~6 player PR clan StrkTm
beavis.uk^
Posts: 73
Joined: 2007-12-28 21:30

Post by beavis.uk^ »

yes you are right, however... i feel people will be afraid to use 50's cuz you get shot very fast, and if you can't shoot back for 3seconds oh boy... better dig your grave ;)
M.J.Patterson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 648
Joined: 2006-09-20 16:04

Post by M.J.Patterson »

:goodvibes
Last edited by M.J.Patterson on 2008-01-04 21:57, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Crusader09
Posts: 179
Joined: 2007-06-26 16:51

Post by Crusader09 »

I'll like this suggestion when, and ONLY when we can actually jump on the .50cal instead of jumping in the driver seat THEN switching to the .50cal. Save us a few extra seconds so the delay can't be complained about.
=ICC=
In game name: ELITE_TANKER

"Discipline is the soul of an army. It makes small numbers formidable; procures success to the weak, and esteem to all."
-George Washington
<1sk>Headshot
Posts: 893
Joined: 2007-05-14 21:51

Post by <1sk>Headshot »

Patterson is a bad man.
"Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pac Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive music."
7eveN
Posts: 131
Joined: 2007-12-28 15:27

Post by 7eveN »

Well ya it is kind of realistic.
You pulling the thing back to make the black steel thing flash and people falling down on the ground.
Image
Waaah_Wah
Posts: 3167
Joined: 2007-07-26 13:55

Post by Waaah_Wah »

No, no. .50 cal needs to be feared ;)
Never argue with an idiot, he will just drag you down to his level and beat you by experience ;)

Killing for peace is like f*cking for virginity

I :33_love: Jaymz
Razick
Posts: 397
Joined: 2007-12-04 01:46

Post by Razick »

Waaah_Wah wrote:No, no. .50 cal needs to be feared ;)
.50 cal IS feared what are talking about. You fire at one guys direction and his whole squad will hit the deck automatically. What the .50 cal doesnt need is a new exploitation.
BloodBane611
Posts: 6576
Joined: 2007-11-14 23:31

Post by BloodBane611 »

Patterson IS a bad man. But possibly a good man too. Complicated.
[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1"
unrealalex
Posts: 1595
Joined: 2007-07-29 21:51

Post by unrealalex »

agreeed please add this
beavis.uk^
Posts: 73
Joined: 2007-12-28 21:30

Post by beavis.uk^ »

I didn't see what Patterson said :( *cries hoping it wasn't aimed at me*
jayceon515
Posts: 436
Joined: 2007-07-24 14:19

Post by jayceon515 »

This would make landrovers even more useless than they are now. They already offer you no protection from small arms fire and adding a 3 seconds delay for switching seats will make them wheeled coffins 101.
Drav
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2144
Joined: 2007-12-14 16:13

Post by Drav »

ye i disagree too. Fair enough you should have a gunner in your jeep rather than switching, but unlike the tanks, it wouldnt have that much of an impact on the gameplay, and the guys in the 50 cals arent that hard to kill anyway. We have enough restrictions in the game already (which are all for a good reason) but lets not go overboard. Next there will be a three second delay to leave a vehicle because you have to take your seat belt off.

I agree with all the HAT/Tank time restrictions, but in my opinion this would be getting a little bit anal :)
SethLive!
Posts: 1582
Joined: 2007-02-10 22:46

Post by SethLive! »

dont forget to add this delay on the tank .50s
Image
Someone please tell me that the above is irony.
Or I'll rip my own eyes out with a sardine.
-[R-Mod] Masaq
Doom721
Posts: 503
Joined: 2006-07-30 13:32

Post by Doom721 »

Thats always fun, watching some solo tanker run around trying to kill people who is so impatient he hops in the tanks mounted fifty and gets shot out :P
Image
"FAIL" - Right after you drive on the grass in Gran Turismo 4
Playing PR since Halo dropping spec ops and SL spawn ;) ( .3 :razz: )
Proud Member of the ~6 player PR clan StrkTm
[T]Terranova7
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2005-06-19 20:28

Post by [T]Terranova7 »

jayceon515 wrote:This would make landrovers even more useless than they are now. They already offer you no protection from small arms fire and adding a 3 seconds delay for switching seats will make them wheeled coffins 101.
I believe the real issue here is the one man "jeepers" that drive around, stop on a dime and switch to the .50 cal position, tearing up a whole squad in the blink of an eye. It's not something that's commonly seen, but it is still sort of a gamey tactic.

Not to mention, most players don't even use the jeep correctly anyway. Most of the time I see players drive jeeps within close range of the enemy force, only to be surrounded and slaughtered. The proper way to use jeeps IMO is to engage at a distance (especially now considering that the .50s are practically laser accurate), usually to support other friendlies. They're also useful in guarding chokepoints and bobblenecks in defensive roles.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”