[2017_07_17_19_11_48 T1 SQUAD 2] CAS_ual_TY: !resign #3us inf
< 4 people got resigned >
[2017_07_17_19_12_28 GLOBAL] Liam: id a squad just get resigned because they're locked at <6 people?
[2017_07_17_19_12_48 TEAM 1] CAS_ual_TY: and making place for a proper squad
[2017_07_17_19_12_55 TEAM 1] CAS_ual_TY: it was free kitting because the 1st sl left
[2017_07_17_19_13_19 TEAM 1] Liam: ave you looked at our squad screen?
[2017_07_17_19_13_36 TEAM 1] CAS_ual_TY: we let go when the squad is doing teamwork or is being useful
[2017_07_17_19_13_44 TEAM 1] CAS_ual_TY: unless we need the space
I thought you were talking about your own squad... Since your were locked at 3 people.
Anyways, as I said, unless needed, we let clans and friends stay on their own. There were like 2 full free kit squads, and one inf squad with 5 players in it (and the free kit squad resigned with 4 players). The resigning free'd 1 slot for another SL to open a squad if he wants to, and the players resigned got forced to join another squad, which lead to them joining an actual inf squad.
The main situation when enforcing of this rule is needed, is when you have a maximum amount of asset squads. Then you sometimes dont have enough room for infy if squads lock below 6.
And forcing clans to unlock in a situation when its not needed is bad, since clans usually dont integrate pubs into their squad gameplay unless they know them. So the player would end up free kitting anyways. However, he would be taking away a kit of an actual valuable inf squad, consisting of clans, which would then hurt this inf squad.
I hope what I wrote made sense. We could change the rules, but I think its better this way to let players know that in general we do not allow locking below 6, unless following the rule would actually hurt your own team in a (slightest) way.
