Page 6 of 31
Posted: 2007-10-22 21:26
by DarkTalon
tesher07 wrote:Umm what army would be using it?
the US Army...
Posted: 2007-10-22 21:50
by Ironcomatose
DarkTalon wrote:the US Army...
And the British.
Posted: 2007-10-23 06:34
by Desertfox
ironcomatose wrote:And the British.
And the Canadians.
lol I had to do that.
Posted: 2007-10-23 07:31
by ice_killer
me to these nations use the CH-47
Argentina
Australia
Canada
Egypt
Greece
Iran
Italy
Japan
South Korea
Libya
Morocco
Netherlands
Republic of China (Taiwan)
Singapore
Spain
Thailand
United Kingdom (see Boeing Chinook (UK variants))
United States
Vietnam captured ex-VNAF Chinooks
Posted: 2007-10-23 08:35
by Cheeseman
Posted: 2007-10-23 08:56
by Dylan
I went to see the blue angels about a week or so ago and walked through one. Camera was dead though. It is more cramped then I had thought, especially the cockpit.
Posted: 2007-10-23 09:48
by ice_killer
i think ill use the last screen of egg
Posted: 2007-10-23 09:48
by ice_killer
Posted: 2007-10-23 10:03
by MAINERROR
I meian i'd love to see this baby implemented but i can't get the point cause of this stupid engine-limitations ...
BTW ... ice_killer it looks very nice!

Posted: 2007-10-23 12:53
by ice_killer
looks cool but wont be able to help me out sinds there a complete other chopper
Posted: 2007-10-23 23:51
by Teek
Fail!
The sea knight is almost half the size.
Posted: 2007-10-24 08:34
by Hitperson
you need a hole in the floor as well.
Posted: 2007-10-25 01:56
by A-10Warthog
usmc needs a huey more than a chinook.
Posted: 2007-10-25 12:27
by [uBp]Irish
true fact.
Posted: 2007-10-25 14:29
by [SAF]stal20048
osprey= fail
Posted: 2007-10-25 16:43
by 77SiCaRiO77
osprey=win