Page 6 of 30

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-22 01:58
by vfn4i83
BluFor of course. All because of balance issues, more mobility and versatile than the defenders and most important armor either vehicle and soldier, aways.

To be mentioned the great versatility to overcome and subdue enemies and it ambushes. Never had fear to face a enemy with a RPG, since .7 .

Ins maps are just a BluFor rush toward enemies.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-22 12:04
by Arnoldio
Fallujah - US
Archer - Either
Basrah - Brit
Korengal - Either
Ramiel - I dont like the map, but i'd rather be US
Karbala - Insurgents

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-22 12:09
by ChiefRyza
Love Insurgents all the way, on nearly every map. Nothing beats challenging yourself in-game and the game always changes as insurgents. They're just so dynamic to play with.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-22 15:52
by mosinmatt
It takes guts to play as the insurgents. The blufor are just so.....easy to play as. They are boring.
They all want to have their "lolz sniping AR" and cant do anything else.
I like the challenge, even with the horrible new RPG that is totally useless now.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-29 15:55
by RememberTheAlamo
BLUFOR

But Insurgents have BIG RED and i love BIG RED

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-29 16:11
by HunterMed
Insurgents except on Operation Archer... Scopes pwnage for US + no available IEDs take away much fun imo for the insurgents/taliban

Ambushing blind Bluefors with traps and IEDs, or blowing up a convoy of HMMVs without being seen... Omg could there be anything better? :D

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-29 16:13
by Hitman.2.5
Bluefor all the way

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 01:02
by Maniac302
I really like to be the civilian. (Or medic on Blufor) There is just something appealing about it to me. (Especially when I get shot dead by a Blufor at 5m.) I ROFL every time. Wins for insurgents!

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 01:40
by jag566
i prefer insurgency over playing the bluefor...even with the spawn times i enjoy playing as civy, especially now with the ablity to put your hands up...luring the bluefor into ambushes has become so much simpler and satisfying :mrgreen:

its even more satisfying when u come upon a careless sniper and knife him... :-D

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 03:16
by Trooper909
Insurgent every map ALLHA AKBAR! :mrgreen:

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 06:03
by torenico
Fallujah=US
Basrah= UK
Karbala= US
Archer= US
Korengal= US
Ramiel= US


Isnt US awesome?

I play INS a very.. but very special cases.. i dont like the AK47, AK74U.

Now, if you say Militia or Russia, Militia.. ofc!

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 13:08
by TayloR016
Definetly BLUFOR for me, you're more likely to get a squad that talks and actually has some organization.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 13:52
by Jedimushroom
I really just don't like Insurgency, it plays like a pretty lame version of AAS with a new model for flags in my experience. It's a pity I have yet to find an AAS only server.

EDIT: Actually that's not entirely fair, Basrah is full of win but that's about all I'll play happily, don't even ask about Karbala or the valley of death.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 14:14
by Pure_beef
insurgents are good on small maps, as everything is quite close. Bigger maps e.g. fallujah are no fun, due to the lack of RP's it means you could be waiting/walking a very long time to get to the action + you wont be with your squad when u find it

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 17:29
by mosinmatt
Pure_beef wrote:insurgents are good on small maps, as everything is quite close. Bigger maps e.g. fallujah are no fun, due to the lack of RP's it means you could be waiting/walking a very long time to get to the action + you wont be with your squad when u find it
Not to mention, on the more open maps, the APCs camp out in the middle of a field where you cant get to it.
A guy racked up 50+ kills by soloing an APC just sitting in a field.
Since the RPGs are now useless, no one could get to him as you had to cross open fields where he could see everything.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 17:30
by Brummy
OPFOR, Civis are fun.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 19:35
by job86
BLUFOR most of the time.

I dislike the lack of teamplay on the insurgents team. You (or I) never see the insurgents stage an ambush with more than 2-3 guys in an organised fashion. It's usually 1 guy who got a IED placed somewhere and the rest of the team running around in circles trying to find americans to shoot at.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-30 19:58
by Mujahideen_Talib
If u see me in a Server u kno who i would pick,

PRAISE ALLAH! :p

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-07-01 03:54
by theflidgeface
for me insurgents is more about fun and using ieds and such, and blufor is mostly about teamwork... if u have a good squad. so i dont mind either way if i wanna lay back then ill choose insurgents but if i looking to really work with a squad then blufor.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-07-01 13:22
by Praxxen
I prefer the insurgents if it is a Taliban map, otherwise it is just boring to wait with a RPG for a car to drive by, and if you miss then yea, throw some rocks! ;D