Project Reality Forums

Looks like Fallujah just got win-sauce spilled all over it!!

[quote=""'[Amish"]Kommando;1221542']

Snazz" wrote:It doesn't matter what it is replacing. It is a Marine M1A1, they were used in Fallujah IRL.



Still Asset Details for DMSD0603753


OT: Did anyone else notice the Coleman cooler on the turret? ^^

They needed to keep their beers cold for their victory party.

Wow that is so cool cant wait the new 0.9 is going to be unreal.




Trigger

I like how you can see the supply crates in the back of the logistic's truck.

wow!! keep at it. good job.

sweet!!! cannot wait!

@ snazz well if you insist ive added some new sangars, i actually didnt have the files on my computer before so forgot about them. But congrats you have directly affected the map

I noticed there are 2 machine guns on the turret. Does this mean there will be 4 men manning the tank? (Driver, main gunner, commander, 50. gunner?)

I guess so, i checked, there are 2 MG's on the in game abrams now. Hmm, i guess insurgents are going to have a fairly hard time to take it down.

Bazul14 wrote:I guess so, i checked, there are 2 MG's on the in game abrams now. Hmm, i guess insurgents are going to have a fairly hard time to take it down.

Naah, IIRC i saw a Tandem RPG-7 on the new weapon cache model. It shouldn't be too hard to take out a tank with one of those in the city unless it is properly supported by infantry.

can i see the cache with the tandem RPG-7 if possible?

Bazul14 wrote:can i see the cache with the tandem RPG-7 if possible?

Ammo Cache Update - Spot the Diffrence! - Project Reality Forums

Why give Insurgents a current U.S. base if it was in such horrible spot on map that U.S. side had such a hard time defending?

In another word I can imagine Insurgent side player having horrible time just as U.S. side player did in current and previous versions.

Human_001 wrote:Why give Insurgents a current U.S. base if it was in such horrible spot on map that U.S. side had such a hard time defending?

In another word I can imagine Insurgent side player having horrible time just as U.S. side player did in current and previous versions.

Usually baseraping is not allowed for anyone but insurgents, meaning their base wont get raped.

Human_001 wrote:Why give Insurgents a current U.S. base if it was in such horrible spot on map that U.S. side had such a hard time defending?

In another word I can imagine Insurgent side player having horrible time just as U.S. side player did in current and previous versions.

What else should happen to an abandoned fortified base area? The insurgents took it over(back). Also, I don`t think it`s harder for the insurgents to defend than the rest of the map.

Thats how it is in real life

myles wrote:Thats how it is in real life

how what is?

Human_001 wrote:Why give Insurgents a current U.S. base if it was in such horrible spot on map that U.S. side had such a hard time defending?

In another word I can imagine Insurgent side player having horrible time just as U.S. side player did in current and previous versions.

the thing is that the old US base is in a nice part of the city, the city is where INS rule

the area where the new base is was an area that no self respecting insurgent would tread unless forced by pitchforks covered with dog excrement as it had no cover or CQB oppotunities.

gazzthompson wrote:how what is?

The fallujah west main base which is currently in use is the oppisite of where it is IRL but now since its moved itll be like the real base.

the Abrams this, the Abrams that. Screw the Abrams, nobody noticed the ramp leading out of the insurgent main? I am going to have SOOO much fun with that!

no but srsly, i hope the M1A2 TUSK makes it into .9