Project Reality Forums

System Specifications

Operating System: Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad at 3.15 Ghz
Graphics Card : Nvidia Geforce GTX 260
Amount of RAM : 4 GB
Sound Card : Creative X-Fi Titanium


BF2 Graphics Settings


Resolution : 1680x1050

Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 8x (16x in .87)
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

9 (7 if I turn AA back up to 16x)

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza Beach
Fallujah West
Lashkar Valley
Yamalia

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Gaza Beach - around the center of the map
Fallujah West - around the center of the map, might be around new statics
Lashkar Valley - around the center of the map
Yamalia - Using APC zoom in the fields with lots of flowers

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Any map not mentioned here above.

Note: I can usually go around with 80 FPS, usually. Performance issues for me mean a drop to 20-40 FPS. Nothing I can't deal with.

System Specifications
Operating System :Win7 home premium 64
CPU :Intel E8400 @3.6
Graphics Card :Ati 4850 1Gb (ati 10.1 drivers) @700mhz/1000mhz
Amount of RAM :4Gb Ram 6400/800
Sound Card :X -fi Titanium PCI-e

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution :1900x1080
Terrain :High
Effects :High
Geometry :High
Texture :High
Lighting :High
Dynamic Shadows :High
Dynamic Light :High
Anti-Aliasing :8x
Texture Filtering :High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes (Before mostly 80-100fps, now ranging from 20 to 90/99)

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
5

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
West Faluhja-> lowest performer
new maps

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
West Faluhja looking into the city even in a ditch not looking at anything other than dirt.
Looking through binos at city gives almost the old performance on Faluja.
Silent eagle, looking at the village.
Lashkar, BSOD in a cornfield 30fps.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
na

System Specifications

Operating System: Windows 7 Proffesinal 64-bit
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 3.00 Ghz
Graphics Card : Geforce 9800 GTS
Amount of RAM : 4 GB
Sound Card :


BF2 Graphics Settings


Resolution : 1440x900

Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 8x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza Beach
Fallujah West
Lashkar Valley


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Gaza Beach - around the center of the map
Fallujah West - when looking N from main. This map is the one most signifant perfomence loos for me of all maps.
Lashkar Valley - around the center of the map


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

iirc all the rest may have missed some

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
CPU : AMD Athlon II x2 (3.0Ghz)
Graphics Card : BFG 9600 GT - 512Mb
Amount of RAM : 4 GB's corsair DDR2 800Mhz
Sound Card : Onboard Audio

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1280 x 1024
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 8x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

-Yes.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

-7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

- Fallujah west, Lashkar Valley, Silent Eagle. (Haven't played siege at whatever or Iron Ridge yet.)

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

On Fallujah west in 0.87, I had an average FPS of around 50-60. Now my average is 20-30. My FPS drops the most when I look into the middle of the map, (5-15). And when on the West side of Fallujah, (With the open fields + grass).

Silent eagle Starts acting up when I am in the forests.

Lashkar valley gives me an average FPS of around 30-35, and decreasing the most when on the mountains/hills and looking into the valley, (15-30).



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Pretty much all the old maps. Although I think there is a 10-15 FPS drop for me in operation archer.

I absolutely love PR .9. You guys have made the game much better! If this problem isn't resolved, I don't care. I'll just get a new graphics card. It's worth playing my favorite game!

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP PRO
* CPU : AMD single core 1.8GHZ
* Graphics Card : Radeon 9800 SE
* Amount of RAM : 2GB
* Sound Card : on board


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :800X600

* Terrain :low/off
* Effects :low/off
* Geometry :low/off
* Texture :low/off
* Lighting :low/off
* Dynamic Shadows :low/off
* Dynamic Light :low/off
* Anti-Aliasing :low/off
* Texture Filtering :low/off
View range: 90%


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes, its so bad I cannot use my gltd on trying to zoom a second time i ctd and when i get on the deploy-able tow as well =(


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
2 in .8 I was doing alright only lagging out a little on dense city in insurgency maps but now its everywhere this is down from a rating of 8 even on my old junk machine.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Gaza, Dragon Fly, unable to recall the third sorry devs


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Gaza, city is hard to move in the video lag is so bad, I get lost trying to cross the street
Dragon fly - every few seconds I have to wait for a second, no matter where on the map, worse in city & facing twords the city from outside, I can lag jeeps in a circle.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Muttrah, yamalia, kashan (have not played all the old .8 maps that crossed into .9 yet)

System Specifications

• Operating System : Win 7 64-bit
• CPU : Core2Duo 3ghz
• Graphics Card : 5870
• Amount of RAM : 4gb
• Sound Card : on-board

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1680 x 1050

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 8x
• Texture Filtering :High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

No. The game always ran perfectly smooth before and it always runs perfectly smooth now (note I never look at my fps).

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

10

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

I have yet to experience any lag and I've played all the new maps with 64 players

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

NA

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

No issues at all. Always super smooth on all maps.

System Specifications

• Operating System : XP Pro 32 (minimum services/processes)
• CPU : E8400 @ 4.05GHz
• Graphics Card : 4850 512mb
• Amount of RAM : 4GB @ 900
• Sound Card : SB Audigy 2

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1680x1050 (down from 1920x1200 on 0.87)

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : Medium
• Lighting : Medium
• Dynamic Shadows : Medium
• Dynamic Light : Medium
• Anti-Aliasing : 8x
• Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes. I believe FPS seems lower on most maps than it should, compared to .87.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

If 0.87 was a 9, 0.9 is 3. From 90 fps to 30 fps.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Haven't played them all but Fallujah, Yashkar, Yamalia and Gaza aren't great.

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Like everyone else, centre of maps are worst. Yashkar is worst in the fields, the mountains are fine.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Can't say for sure whether or not all maps aren't suffering from some FPS drops because I never ran renderer.drawfps all the time, unlike now. Plus I only play 1 or 2 maps a day, if I'm lucky.

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows 7 64 Bit
CPU : Intel i7 CPU Q 720 @1.60 ghz 4 cores(mobile)
Graphics Card : NVIDIA GT230M(mobile)
Amount of RAM : 4 GB
Sound Card : NVIDIA High Definition Audio

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : Med
Terrain : Med
Effects : Med
Geometry : Med
Texture : Med
Lighting : Med
Dynamic Shadows : Med
Dynamic Light : Med
Anti-Aliasing : Med
Texture Filtering : Med

-Was running everything on hgih recently started to run BF2 on high before on .87 ran on low cause I never cared much to adjust settings. Ran Iron Ridge and another map on high ( just got PR installed today) and worked ok but with some drastic freezes in some maps turned down to med.

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Beirut, Quai River, Lashkar Valley, don't know about other maps haven't played on many yet

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

In Beirut framrate started to drop in random parts of the east half of the map, then bounce back up after a few seconds. Lashkar Valley was sugglish the entire round I played FPS don't know exact amount it was playable but seemed the worst next to the mountain and fields stayed consistent in that part, and was still slowed down but better at British uncap.

Also I joined 2 servers in a row and game was slowed and could not sprint or jump, only switch weapons.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.


Had luck with the GB vs milita map, Iron Ridge seemed fine didn't notice much.

System Specifications

* Operating System : XP Pro 32
* CPU : E5200 @ 2.5GHZ
* Graphics Card : 7900 GTX XXXX Edition
* Amount of RAM : 4GB DDR2 @ 1033Mhz (3.5 recognized with XP32)
* Sound Card : Creative X-Fi Xtreme Audio

BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1280 x 960 (down from 1280 x 1024 0.87)

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : Medium (down from High 0.87)
* Dynamic Shadows : Medium (down from High 0.87)
* Dynamic Light : Medium (down from High 0.87)
* Anti-Aliasing : 4x
* Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Only on new 0.9 maps and updated older maps

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

Probably a 4-5 down from a 9 in 0.87

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Fallujah between 20-25 FPS, Gaza Strip 30-40, and Lashkar Valley between 20-40 depending on the area. Also can't load Dragonfly, get a memory error on load.

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Fallujah pretty much everywhere besides looking towards the outskirts, Gaza everywhere within the city, and Lashkar looking into the valley.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Any of the old maps not changed or added in 0.9, 70-80 FPS on most old maps.

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 1
CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6700 @ 2.66GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS
Amount of RAM : 6142MB
Sound Card : Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio)

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : High
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 8x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes, if I zoom in from armored vehicles I get a big FPS drop, I usually have bad performance in maps with lots of static objects such as trees (Fraps/xfire also slows down my performance once I start recording)


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Yamalia, Dragon Fly, any map with lots of trees

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Zooming in with armored vehicles while on the move/sometimes stationary, everything else like optics on rifles are alright I think.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Gaza (I think) Beirut (I think) Lashkar Valley (maybe)

System Specifications

• Operating System : XP SP3
• CPU : E8200 2.66Ghz
• Graphics Card : GeForce GTS 8800 512
• Amount of RAM : 2Gb DDR 2 800 mhz
• Sound Card : onboard

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1280x1024

• Terrain :high
• Effects :high
• Geometry : high
• Texture : medium
• Lighting : high
• Dynamic Shadows : high
• Dynamic Light : high
• Anti-Aliasing : 4x
• Texture Filtering : high

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
yes



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
6 of 10



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
dragon fly (more then 2Gb ram required with textures on medium)
falluagah west
korengal valley
Silent Eagle


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
korengal - US main.
yamalia, i have strong lags when i close to LAV 25 and someone or me take it.
fallujah west - when i look from us main to city i have 20 fps, when i turn around - i have 86-92 fps (in 0.87 i always have 80-100 fps)

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
karbala, operation barracuda, qwai river, gaza beach...

**I turned off one core of processor and it has helped but not much

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
* CPU : AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core 2.3 GHz
* Graphics Card : BFG Tech GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB
* Amount of RAM : 4GB DDR2 800mhz
* Sound Card : Sound Blaster X-Fi

BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1680x1050

* Terrain :high
* Effects :high
* Geometry : high
* Texture : high
* Lighting : high
* Dynamic Shadows : high
* Dynamic Light : high
* Anti-Aliasing : off
* Texture Filtering : high


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
yes



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
5 of 10 when i can play the levels that don't drop FPS which so far has only been Kashan Desert



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
dragon fly (more then 2Gb ram required with textures on medium)
falluagah west
korengal valley
Iron Ridge


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Basically everytime I'm looking or moving towards the center of the city the FPS drops really bad, when I turn away or look down everything is fine

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
so far the only smoothest one has been Kashan Desert

* Side note: When I quit my recent session of PR i noticed that my Windows 7 color scheme was that of the Windows Basic color scheme then it changed back to my normal color scheme if that makes any sense. I don't know if it was just my computer being slow with loading the colors, but in some programs i have such as my Sega Genesis emulator sometimes it will change the windows 7 color to windows basic while running that then it will change back when i quit. So I don't know if PR just did the same thing while i was playing or not...might be something to check on.

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows Vista 32 service pack 2
CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2200 @ 2.20GHz
Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce 7050 / NVIDIA nForce 610i
Amount of RAM : 3,00 G
Sound Card : Realtek High Definition Audio

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1024x768 @ 60Hz
Terrain : Low
Effects : Low
Geometry : Low
Texture : Low
Lighting : Low
Dynamic Shadows : Low
Dynamic Light : Low
Anti-Aliasing : no AA
Texture Filtering : Low


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes I have. Went from medium (0.87) to low (0.9) in settings.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
5/10 (50% of the map I can play actually).


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Iron Ridge (impossible to play) - Korengal Valley - Dragon Fly - Silent Eagle


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Heavily forested maps on every maps (especially the huge ones). Cities are fine except the buildings in Iron Ridge.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Beirut - Gaza Beach - Kashan Desert - Fallujah - Muttrah City

*** I know, my computer is rubbish.

System Specifications

• Operating System: Vista x64 SP2
• CPU: Intel Dualcore E2200 OC'd to 3.2Ghz
• Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4670 512MB
• Amount of RAM: 4GB DDR2
• Sound Card: SB Live 24bit

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution: 1920x1080

• Terrain: High
• Effects: High
• Geometry: High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows: Medium
• Dynamic Light: Medium
• Anti-Aliasing: 8x
• Texture Filtering: Medium

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9:
6

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance:
Yamalia, Lashkar Valley, Dragonfly

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most:
Viewing distanced vehicles/using binoculars/zooming when in vehicles. FPS drops from ~90 down to 15/20

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
AlBasrah, Silent Eagle, Ramiel, Jabal, Qinling, Gaza, Fallujah, Asad Khal, Kashan (etc, etc)

System Specifications

* Operating System :X p Sp3(32-Bit)
* CPU 4 3.06
* Graphics Card :Nvidia 6200 Turboc Cahce
* Amount of RAM :2 Gb Dual DDR2
* Sound Card :O nBoard


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1024*768 60Hz

* Terrain :Low
* Effects : Low
* Geometry :Low
* Texture :Medium
* Lighting :O ff
* Dynamic Shadows :O ff
* Dynamic Light :O ff
* Anti-Aliasing :O ff
* Texture Filtering :Low



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Massive

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

Before:10
Now:2

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
I Only Try Lashkar Valley and Silent Eagle After Delete PR



4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
I Only Try Lashkar Valley and Silent Eagle


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

I Only Try Lashkar Valley and Silent Eagle

System Specifications

• Operating System :Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
• CPU :Core 2 Quad Q9550 2,8Ghz
• Graphics Card : ATI HD4850 1024mb
• Amount of RAM : 8GB
• Sound Card : onboard

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1680x1050

• Terrain :High
• Effects :High
• Geometry :High
• Texture :High
• Lighting :High
• Dynamic Shadows :High
• Dynamic Light : On
• Anti-Aliasing :0
• Texture Filtering : -

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
8


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Beirut , Gaza , Fallujah


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Beirut : When I look into the town I get an FPS drop down to 25 frames.
Same in Gaza normally 100 but between buildings frames get down to 25-30.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
All the old maps.



Edit: After I tourned my AA down from 8x to 0x I get an major performance boost.
I think my graphics card is good enough to handle AA at BF2... so the prob is maybe somewhere there

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows XP
CPU : AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+ 2.41GHz
Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT
Amount of RAM : 6GB
Sound Card : Onboard (Realtek?)

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1920x1080
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : Medium
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : Off
Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

6/10
Although its map related. 0.87 ran without problems.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Yamalia, Iron Ridge, Ochamchira

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Woods and Fields, especially when zooming in with the scope.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Gaza and Beirut ran pretty well.

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows Vista
CPU : AMD Phenom 2 X3 720 Processor 2.80 GHz
Graphics Card : Nvidia Geforce 9800 GT
Amount of RAM : 2GB
Sound Card : Onboard

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1280 x 1024
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture :Medium
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : Off
Dynamic Light : Medium
Anti-Aliasing : 8x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

7


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Yamalia, Gaza Beach, Lashkar Valley

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Yamalia: the fields cause huge FPS drops, forest areas are fine.
Gaza Beach: When looking at the middle of the map/ the city the FPS drops.
Lashkar Valley:When looking over large distances with many fields the FPS drops.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Asad Khal, Siege at Orchamachira, Iron ridge, Muttrah, Silent Eagle.

System Specifications

• Operating System : Win7 Pro 64bit
• CPU : E6750 @ 3.2ghz atm
• Graphics Card : GTX 260
• Amount of RAM : 8GB DDR2
• Sound Card : Creative Xfi Xtreme music

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1680x1050x32

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : x8
• Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Maybe on some maps, but not much, down to longer VD maybe?



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

9


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragonfly is the only one really up to now.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

In the City, most places.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Nearly all others, as said not been on all yet.

System Specifications

• Operating System : XP Sp3
  CPU : E6750 (oc @ 3ghz)
  Graphics Card : 8800gt 512mo
  Amount of RAM : 2Go cas4
  Sound Card : onboard

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1680/1050

• Terrain :high
• Effects :high
• Geometry :high
• Texture : high
• Lighting :high
• Dynamic Shadows :high
• Dynamic Light :high
• Anti-Aliasing :2x
• Texture Filtering :high

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes, 087 ran at an almost constant 100fps, with 0.9 the max is around 80 and the minimum drops under 28fps

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

4/10


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon valley, lashkar valley, beiruth, falluja...

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Looking towards the middle of the map.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Gaza beach, asad kahl, more generally all CoOp maps run fine with 48 bots and all the graphics on high.
Lashakar valley on multiplayer is very painful, on coop it runs fine.

Observations.

textures on medium helped me a lot, it doesnt heal the fps drops but il reduces the load so that the fps dont drop under 30. I do really belive that the answer is somwhere in the coop mode as it runs fine with more cpu usage.

Second observation, 0.87 used 1200 mo average on my system, on all the maps with memory lag i average at 2360 mo running in the back ground. Sitting on the desktop windows takes approx 380mo.

If it can be helpful i can allso get the memory usage from prsp.