Project Reality Forums

3 LAVs

USA not USMC

and the Vodnick Model will never return to PR afaik because its such an aweful model. the BRDM is used instead afaik.

I'd like to see the idea of what you propose though, a light armour mode almost, jeeps and light APCs.

I say let the people play the kashan they prefer, its all realistic really, its just different gameplay

64, because in my expierence the heli's last about 10 seconds with all that AA.

this seems to happen every time you Laze up, mark up and inform them of what theyre engaging.

Only for them to move in and get pwned.

I know there are some good pilots for attack heli's out there, I just havnt seen any of them yet unfortunatly..

64+ FTW!
or Skirmish!!

i like 64 because when your under heavy fire you can just call a jet in it feels very relaistic

64 FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dr2B Rudd wrote:Ya know what I'd REALLY love?

the use of the 128 layer (I don't mean 128 players, just the layer)

So Rudd, what would be on this layer?

I'm after a more interesting asset spread.

right now it seems like PR is "you can either have the weak APCs, or the WTFPWNBBQ apcs"

Why can't we mix Bradleys and Strykers, BTRs and BMPs? How about TOW humvees thrown in for spice?

Having all these different vehicles would reward the teams that stick together imo. And possibly, this layer would have no air assets.

Don't go insane about that comment, its just something different since all other kashan layers do have air assets.

Because afaik there is NO map in PR that has a "ARMOUR" layer, and I think it would be fun if there was one.

yes! maybe even a 256 layer and others, i dont know if you can have a number that isn't 2^x but just something!


as for the poll, my vote goes to 32, from a point of view of what asset i prefer the choppers win, and when i'm on the ground i love calling in heli strikes, be it hydra strafe run, long distance cannon fire, or hellfires.

(more layers though , armour layer / APC layer would be awesome)

^ I just said 128 because thats in the bf2 files

Dr2B Rudd wrote:^ I just said 128 because thats in the bf2 files

i know it is, i then played around and made a 256 layer

then i tried to make a 'inf' layer but that failed and just showed up as 0 in the map list.


nevertheless more layers

I will gun an attk helo but not fly it cuz I fail.
Played 64 yesterday, I failed in the A10 and F16 but surprisingly was the best at keeping the A10 up for more than 5 minutes.
Voted 32 cuz I love tanking and I have played 32 more often and found to be marginally better.

32 FTW, jets bring out the worst in people...plus as far as I know you can taxi with the keyboard anymore, you HAVE to have a joystick in order to fly a jet...

steve_06-07 wrote:32 FTW, jets bring out the worst in people...plus as far as I know you can taxi with the keyboard anymore, you HAVE to have a joystick in order to fly a jet...

or a mouse...?

64 Ftw! I dont know,its "the more players the better" for me,so ofc I´d take 64.

To me i prefer the 64 then 16 then 32. Atleast when there are jets they cant completly own the battlefield on their own (unlike an attack heli can) It means there has to be an element of teamwork envolved in laser targeting and such that the planes can do their job..

The infantry on kashan doesnt really get used much but is highly useful especially on 64 and 16 as the jets can have a harder time taking out a FB with set up AA and a good person on it.

Thats also a reason why i like the 16 as it involves lots of infantry tactics especially concerning the bunkers area. Theres nothing like a good old infantry fight around the bunkers, going out and around to the south entrance with no worry of tanks being sat outside waiting to waste you. But yeah kashan is a good map for tank warfare however some of the air assets overpower that. Kufrah needs its tanks back =]

I like 32 the most, and the reason is...CHOPPAAAZ!!!

Dekno wrote:64 Ftw! I dont know,its "the more players the better" for me,so ofc I´d take 64.

you do realise that the 16 and 32 layers despite being a smaller numbers are designed for a full 64 player server, the only difference to the 64 layer being the assets available.


64 layer = standard
32 layer = alternative
16 layer = infantry (but NOT skirmish, still full size map with light transport vehicles)

Sars99 wrote:you do realise that the 16 and 32 layers despite being a smaller numbers are designed for a full 64 player server, the only difference to the 64 layer being the assets available.


64 layer = standard
32 layer = alternative
16 layer = infantry (but NOT skirmish, still full size map with light transport vehicles)

I do,but its still the more players the better for me

Dekno wrote:I do,but its still the more players the better for me

ok now i'm really lost, player numbers don't come into it :S

Jets is the best, when you put 2 good pilots in, and a very good spotter, you dominate the map, the rest lies in defense through tanks, and at least 2 infantry squads, no AA is needed.

64 mostly but 16 is also pretty fun sometimes

64 @ night

Choppers, Jets suck in PR until they do something about the playing area ...

This poll shows its age. 16 hasnt been the same without the Vodnik vs. Humvee battles.

Somehow the BRDM vs. Humvee match up is not as good.

As a frequent tanker i find the choppers in 32 a much more annoying presence then even a decent A10 pilot (especially since i discovered that im pretty good at shooting em down even with a 9M113 from a BMP).