Page 7 of 10

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-03-31 02:34
by Tirak
That's a Sea Knight mate, notice the landing gear.

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-03-31 09:15
by MCI
'[R-DEV wrote:Rhino;978667']......

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f196-p ... pdate.html

Archer is far too small...
:shock: NICE!

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-01 12:54
by SocketMan
Tannhauser wrote:Mi-26 owns your little prissy chinook.

But it's so big ... It would require a map twice the size of Kashan. So no, big no.
yes Mi-26 is on the bigger side,



Image


Image



but to be honest that's not what I had in mind.



This is more like it:

Image


Image



KA-52 Alligator | Russian Arms, Military Technology, Analysis of Russia's Military Forces


‘Alligators’ to take the sky by storm

permalinke-mail story to a friendprint version
30 October, 2008, 21:23
Russia has launched mass production of the Ka-52 strike helicopter nicknamed ‘the Alligator’. Based on the Ka-50 ‘Black Shark", the new version is designed as a commander’s vehicle and has several features for combat coordination.


‘Alligators’ to take the sky by storm | Top Stories from 2008-10-30 | RT


I know we had a thread or 2 (or more) about Ka-50 and Oleg has actually made one.Some arguments (for not using it) were:
there are only a few of these in service and all in the "special forces" (spetznaz)

So what changed?
Well,Ka-52 is the 2 seat version of Ka-50,much more "conventional" (exclude the side by side seats) and is going to mass production.
Mass production of course does not mean thousands or even hundreds,like it was
back in USSR days.

Anyway don't mean to go OT here,just in case a question like this:

"What do we give the big Russian bear in terms of attack helicopters?"

comes up.
:15_cheers

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-02 04:46
by Qaiex
[R-MOD]Tirak wrote:That's a Sea Knight mate, notice the landing gear.
I think we was referring more to the act of failing.
Hilarious. ^^

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-02 06:04
by Teek
Flipping past helicopter pictures I noticed this nice specimen.
I would say that the Mi-26 is slightly too large
Image

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-02 14:47
by Noobofthenight
IAJTHOMAS wrote:Everyone get ready for:
Noob pilot. Gawwwd.

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-02 14:51
by cyberzomby
Isnt that the marine-chinook or seaknight or something?

Wouldnt want to joke about that video so much, bunch of people got killed there.

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-03 19:04
by General Dragosh
SocketMan wrote:yes Mi-26 is on the bigger side,



Image


Image



but to be honest that's not what I had in mind.



This is more like it:
Wow this is huge o.O

And the Mil V12 is enormeous :shock:

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-03 20:38
by Cheditor
Lols if you introduced the Mi-26 you could probaly carry over half your team in one go.

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-03 21:58
by DankE_SPB
Mi-26 HALO (MIL)
Standard Payload
  • 20,000 kg Internal or external load
  • over 80 troops, 60 litters, or
  • 2x BRDM-2 scout cars, or 2x BMDs, or
  • 1x BMP or,
  • 1x BTR-60/70/80 or,
  • 1x MT-LB

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-03 21:59
by supahpingi
Cheditor wrote:Lols if you introduced the Mi-26 you could probaly carry over half your team in one go.
Only 8 seats max possible with BF2,so no.
and in real life it could carry up to 150 troops,90 recommended (Mil Mi-26 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

So thats a bit to much of the good stuff for PR :P

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-04 03:37
by Qaiex
cyberzomby wrote:Isnt that the marine-chinook or seaknight or something?

Wouldnt want to joke about that video so much, bunch of people got killed there.

That is the Sea Knight yeah.

supahpingi wrote:Only 8 seats max possible with BF2,so no.
and in real life it could carry up to 150 troops,90 recommended (Mil Mi-26 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

So thats a bit to much of the good stuff for PR :P

Unless of course you put another 8 seat vehicle inside the first 8 seat vehicle, cause then you get 16! :D
Rofl, you could carry the other team in it aswell, and 27 people from another server. XD

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-04 10:19
by Rico
Hopefully it will have 2 crates that can be dropped, to make up for the lack of player space (Or can drop 2 crates and a landy?!)

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-04 10:27
by arjan
a landy sounds nice with some crates :)

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-04 10:29
by supahpingi
qaiex wrote: Unless of course you put another 8 seat vehicle inside the first 8 seat vehicle, cause then you get 16! :D
Rofl, you could carry the other team in it aswell, and 27 people from another server. XD
And that also is not possible due to the collisions(right?)

NENENENENENE

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-04 10:35
by cyberzomby
I would think so. If you dont include a collision it shouldnt be a problem but I guess it wont work like that.

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-04 13:33
by General Dragosh
How'bout we use glue, it always works in the practise :D

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2009-04-05 11:30
by Qaiex
Duct tape is the wave of the future, no more goo made from horses :D

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2010-01-04 14:28
by alberto_di_gio
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote: Again, think of the Chinook as a flying truck, where its biggest role is logistics as well as transport. that has the proportional of setting up a firebase on a LZ that will spawn off many more players than just 8.
Honestly I'm badly waiting for Chinook :) And I hope you guys really working on something that we can use it for vehicle transport just like it is in real.

I can't think how that can be fun and can change the dynamics of the game :) I would like to see a full squad entering battlefield with HMMWV from a Chinook :lol:

Image

Image

Image

Re: The Chinook

Posted: 2010-01-04 15:45
by Outlawz7
Mr. Necro, that was posted 1 year ago.