Project Reality Forums

I prefer insurgents/Taliban but I enjoy both sides. People who only play BluFor are the easiest kills since they don't seem to understand the other sides tactics.

mosinmatt wrote:Not to mention, on the more open maps, the APCs camp out in the middle of a field where you cant get to it.
A guy racked up 50+ kills by soloing an APC just sitting in a field.
Since the RPGs are now useless, no one could get to him as you had to cross open fields where he could see everything.

Yea I fully agree, i can't really see what the Devs were trying to achieve by decreasing the power of an already weak faction. I mean its realistic, insurgents havn't got shit comapred to the US, but on this game we face the old Realism VS fun dilemma

if your gonna play ins mod then you might as well play ins. BLUFOR is boring and you can play conventional all the time on regular maps. besides ins got car bombs = aowsim fun

I dont like both sides.

I like to mix it up a bit and play both equally tbh

The Taliban i think are alot more fun then insurgents, because at least with the tali we can set up rally points and use some strategy...

Depends on the map.

Fallujah - US
Archer - Either, but preferably insurgents. Defending the airstrip is so bad ***
Basrah - Brits, obviously
Korengal - INS
Karbala - INS
Ramiel - US preferably, but I don't mind being an insurgent

Blufor, on every map, playing as the insurgents is pretty ****.

Insurgents, definitely. There's something about being the underdog, setting up ambushes.

Nothing is more satisfying than an IED kill.

I would say Insurgents, it's not about teamwork because you dont get a lot of it in the Insurgency mode, it's some kind of challenge, it's hard, it's more painful... And of course, more fun

I prefer using blufor with the tactics of "Irregular" forces. Surprisingly effective sometimes, when you switch tactics suddenly. Counter-ambush, use of explosives and snipers.

Insurs - their abilities are really different from those of the regular army allowing far more interesting tactics.

I prefer either one of them, BluFor ofcourse have nice assets in which I can take a humvee with some friends and go driving around and try to get to a cache without to much restrictions..

Insurgents, because you have to awesome ability to hide, whilst BluFor are almost always being watched or their position is known, and the random sniper hunt, ambushes and trying to waste BluFor tickets ;p

insurgents ofc..its always more fun to blow sh*t up.And because i know everytime i join a server the US/Brits team is always full..

BLUFOR - Because insurgents are boring.

Don't laugh at the video, just shake your head in pity.

i prefer U.S.....U.S stands for.....well us.

Fallujah-INS
Archer-USA
Basrah-Either
Korengal-Won't play the map.
Ramiel-Either
Karbala-USA

Either. Its fun whether I'm cruising in with my M4 or screaming obscenities about the downfall of the US/UK militaries form their might and imitating their pathetic queen/first lady via All Chat

Scandicci wrote:Blufor, all the way. When we were kids we had to take turns being the cowboys, but somebody had to be the indians.

[...]

Hah, pretty much sums up the topic.

Somebody has to be a 'walking target'.