Page 7 of 12

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 00:08
by Rhino
octo-crab wrote:Between that and the Chinook I think the logistical and transport aspect of Sangin seems to be in order.
No trucks are planned for Sangin since basically all the logistics in Afghanistan for the British are done via helicopter since its far too risky to go via road over predictable roots with all the IEDs about.

Thou there might be one truck or something just for doing vehicle repairs, we are unsure about this part at the mo and we will cross that bridge when we come to it :)

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 00:13
by Stokes52
Wow awesome, I always love new stuff like this in PR. Hey, wait a sec, I played with you on Ramiel yesterday Stigger, haha. I didn't know you guys actually play PR, what with all your time spent "building" it ;) haha jk.

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 00:32
by octo-crab
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:No trucks are planned for Sangin since basically all the logistics in Afghanistan for the British are done via helicopter since its far too risky to go via road over predictable roots with all the IEDs about.

Thou there might be one truck or something just for doing vehicle repairs, we are unsure about this part at the mo and we will cross that bridge when we come to it :)
Well burst my bubble why don't ya.

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 00:34
by Rhino
octo-crab wrote:Well burst my bubble why don't ya.
:D

The truck will be on plenty of other British maps ;)

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 00:43
by HangMan_
will the rpg cages actually help prevent rpg damage in game? or are we still F*ckd when an rpg hits?

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 03:16
by Rudd
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:No trucks are planned for Sangin since basically all the logistics in Afghanistan for the British are done via helicopter since its far too risky to go via road over predictable roots with all the IEDs about.

Thou there might be one truck or something just for doing vehicle repairs, we are unsure about this part at the mo and we will cross that bridge when we come to it :)
could always just do a truck layer as well :P "the weather is too bad" or something :P

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 07:14
by Mad-Mike
looking sh!t hot mate good work, keep it up. ive drove one of these in RL aswell
Image

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 07:26
by Mad-Mike
I would also like to see the mastiff and the viking
Viking
Image
it will be easy for chinook to lift it aswel :D
Image
Mastiff
Image

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 08:26
by Rhino
the viking is not possible to do in BF2, unless we didn't want the back trailer ingame and just the front cab but that would be 1, unrealistic and 2, pointless...

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 08:43
by psychickactivity
Good morning ..

Changes you the robbing of wheel on this truck?.Because now we can see it s more hard than the other version?
It s more hard to change direction now , (ex): in Jabal i have to do a lot of manipulation on the little road near DAM to go back at main....And ,) i reverse a lot of time the truck ...
Shame on me ..

Without this , very good job ..

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 09:10
by psychickactivity
Sorry it s on 7 gates ..

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 13:26
by Mad-Mike
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:the viking is not possible to do in BF2, unless we didn't want the back trailer ingame and just the front cab but that would be 1, unrealistic and 2, pointless...
ok mate thnx 4 info i agree wid ye, no point.

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 14:02
by agentscar
Looks wonderful,great work! :)

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 14:09
by Rudd
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:No trucks are planned for Sangin since basically all the logistics in Afghanistan for the British are done via helicopter since its far too risky to go via road over predictable roots with all the IEDs about.
I was wondering, that negative explosion **** couldn't make it work?

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 14:39
by Arnoldio
I'll be dedicating my self to this and whoring it to the end (if the physics are any better then the 5tnrs)

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 16:10
by McBumLuv
Dr2B Rudd wrote:I was wondering, that negative explosion **** couldn't make it work?
I'm guessing this is in referance to the viking? Well, unless there's a way to push a button and continually fire a projectile withing pressing the fire button, then it would only work if someone is holding down their mouse button all the time :?

And then it would be kinda wierd looking, because you could only have the rear end attached to a static implossion barrel, so it wouldn't work too well even if it was possible I believe.

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 22:36
by zephyr89s
I'm not saying your model is bad, because it isn't. It is highly detailed and looks great. I just question the British designers. sure, you can put an rpg cage on the cabin of the truck, it should protect the people inside. So what? Insurgents can just aim for the bed of the truck, blow it to pieces, and then the driver and passenger can be riddled with AKs. That will be fun to have. Even though it is nearly the same thing, it is always better to have variety. Like more types of trees, bushes or terrain. It adds to the experience!

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 22:44
by Rhino
An RPG is designed to kill the people inside a vehicle more than to stop the vehicle from working ;)

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-01 23:37
by Expendable Grunt
Or, as of .86, it is designed to miss more than do anything.

M.

Re: [Vehicles] New British Army Truck

Posted: 2009-08-02 12:59
by Adetter
Nice,is it possible to shoot through the windows on the trucks that have Metall-net?

And why isnt it metal-net on the fifth picture?