Re: [Changelog] PR v0.9 Features
Posted: 2010-02-02 10:22
OK, when does the FDF come in? 
Also, check the number of AA's one can place in 0.9 - Flying will be interesting to say the least if the opp team really makes a effort in putting up all those AA's. In a 4x4 km square there isn't many places left to hide. One Fob should be able to cover most of a square km and now we can build 6 plus mainbase defenses of course...Snazz wrote:When we've got new 4x4km USMC/GB maps like Jabal 2 or Sangin we'll likely see the Harrier finished, right now it would be kind of overkill on Qinling since there's already a Tornado and Typhoon.
It's a case of lacking large enough maps to use all the jets rather than a prejudice towards the assets.
Although fighter jets dogfighting over a 4x4km space containing 2 opposing airbases is one of the less realistic aspects of PR.
no, no, no! did you play the betas? it is pure awesomeness without rallies. i was a sceptic too but i have been totally converted and can't even stand the spamminess on servers with rallies anymoreTuOuF wrote:Really dissapointed with rally point system
Mmm, it does seem kind of odd it supports up to 12 even though you should only be able to place a max of 6 (1 per FOB).'[twl wrote:Lan;1251460']Also, check the number of AA's one can place in 0.9 - Flying will be interesting to say the least if the opp team really makes a effort in putting up all those AA's.
this doesn't work in .87. i don't think it'll work in .9Snazz wrote:Mmm, it does seem kind of odd it supports up to 12 even though you should only be able to place a max of 6 (1 per FOB).
I guess you can exploit it by destroying the FOB and leaving the AA intact then going to build a new FOB and placing an additional AA.
I don't attempt to find such exploits so I wouldn't know. Perhaps you have a theory on why the limit is 12 not 6?General_J0k3r wrote:this doesn't work in .87. i don't think it'll work in .9![]()
actually i noticed not when i tried to find an exploit but when i built a new fob and couldn't put HMG's coz the old ones at a previously destroyed FOB were still up.Snazz wrote:I don't attempt to find such exploits so I wouldn't know. Perhaps you have a theory on why the limit is 12 not 6?

that would be our beloved PR bot yes'[twl wrote:Lan;1251450']Now that is a damn nice feature in itself. That will make a lot of moviemakers happy. Sweet doesn't even begin to cover this feature!![]()
![]()
Huntermed, hope you've seen that bit!
Could that have been the secret robot thingie with a antenna on the head maybe in the movie?![]()
I am guessing it will be a visible object?[R-DEV]motherdear wrote:that would be our beloved PR bot yes
Oh yes.galeknight1 wrote:Most enjoyable wall of text ever.