PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Post by **Sniperdog** » 2010-10-05 21:59

CobraHumvee wrote:i think the forum alert level needs to move up to OMG, i can already hear the cries of how thermal imaging is going to ruin the mod

Don't worry, OMG is coming soon; and the cries will get worse. You just wait...

Hotrod525 · Post by **Hotrod525** » 2010-10-05 23:10

[R-DEV]Sniperdog wrote:Don't worry, OMG is coming soon; and the cries will get worse. You just wait...

Yeah i hope we will get the changelog very soon, since its the last step before pre-download.

Imchicken1 · Post by **Imchicken1** » 2010-10-05 23:19

[R-DEV]Sniperdog wrote:Don't worry, OMG is coming soon; and the cries will get worse. You just wait...

Why you gotta be like that Sniperdog

ZephyrDark · Post by **ZephyrDark** » 2010-10-06 01:45

Gets worse eh? I hate you. I HATE* YOU ALL. Stop TEASING me... and give us what we want

*I.. I can't believe I said that... I love you all devs, and will always love you as long as you keep being our good ol' devs.

theflidgeface · Post by **theflidgeface** » 2010-10-06 06:13

I just wonder how Insurgent's and Taliban's armory is going to balanced out to these new optics ingame

but i don't really care TI is fuckin awesome haha

dtacs · Post by **dtacs** » 2010-10-06 06:18

Well they're getting the SPG-9 which should destroy tanks in a few shots. The Taliban are also getting G3's for the officer's primary weapon, IDK if other kits are going to get it though.

ryan d ale · Post by **ryan d ale** » 2010-10-06 09:28

dtacs wrote:Well they're getting the SPG-9 which should destroy tanks in a few shots. The Taliban are also getting G3's for the officer's primary weapon, IDK if other kits are going to get it though.

Sounds like a nice upgrade.

IIRC Insurgent leader now gets a FAL. I saw it in an image (i think) but I can't recall anyone mentioning it

ZephyrDark · Post by **ZephyrDark** » 2010-10-06 11:45

ryan d ale wrote:Sounds like a nice upgrade.

IIRC Insurgent leader now gets a FAL. I saw it in an image (i think) but I can't recall anyone mentioning it

I remember on the Unconventional Weapons Update a DEV said that Iraqi Insurgents were getting the FAL for the Cell Leader and Taliban were getting the G3 as their Officer or Cell leader or whatever its name is.

myles · Post by **myles** » 2010-10-06 12:56

Will the white still be there when someone dies on thermal imaging?

Like it would be unrealistic if the white went straight away when someone died.

Wh33lman · Post by **Wh33lman** » 2010-10-06 13:39

Uthric wrote:Germans

are we going to turn IR pictures into a "Whos Vehicle is That?" game in the fourms?

steve_06-07 · Post by **steve_06-07** » 2010-10-06 13:44

Wh33lman wrote:are we going to turn IR pictures into a "Whos Vehicle is That?" game in the fourms?

We should, whoever guess it correctly gets their own IR picture and post it

Post by **Sniperdog** » 2010-10-06 14:13

myles wrote:Will the white still be there when someone dies on thermal imaging?

Like it would be unrealistic if the white went straight away when someone died.

Dead people / destroyed vehicles still show up as hot until the body / wreck disappears.

spawncaptain · Post by **spawncaptain** » 2010-10-06 14:22

And the reason behind this is that the PR implementation of FLIR works based on the fact that lighting effects are rendered differently for static, editor placed objects (prerendered) and those spawned during runtime, correct?

Which would also mean that all deployables would show up as hot on TI?

MCI · Post by **MCI** » 2010-10-06 14:23

If we can have thermal, does that mean that Night vision is possible?

ZephyrDark · Post by **ZephyrDark** » 2010-10-06 14:26

MCI wrote:If we can have thermal, does that mean that Night vision is possible?

Night vision has been possible for a long time, SF had it, but the problem is creating whole new lightmaps for every object on the map or something like that. It had something to do with lighting being screwed up.

Post by **Sniperdog** » 2010-10-06 16:19

spawncaptain wrote:Which would also mean that all deployables would show up as hot on TI?

Only weapons on deployables show as hot.

ComradeHX · Post by **ComradeHX** » 2010-10-06 16:38

So... we should pop a bunch of incendiary instead of smoke now? I now see why most kit get at least two...lol

Hotrod525 · Post by **Hotrod525** » 2010-10-06 18:52

[R-DEV]Sniperdog wrote:Only weapons on deployables show as hot.

does it mean the fob and others ( like barb-wire etc... ) wont show up in thermal ?

Thats awesome

Post by **Spec** » 2010-10-06 18:58

So how exactly was it done, I wonder?

centralhigh76 · Post by **centralhigh76** » 2010-10-06 19:05

Hotrod525 wrote:does it mean the fob and others ( like barb-wire etc... ) wont show up in thermal ? Thats awesome

It will because that will have its own 'temp' he means the guns will sickout more because of the 'heat'. If white = hot the gun will be a white color and wire some grey for between. so you will still be able to see it. Unless thats a bug?? (I bet it would be fixed in the Alpha though.)

PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging

Re: PR 0.95 - Thermal Imaging