Project Reality Forums

Want me to share the chat log stompa ? I have never been banned form a single pr server the closest I have ever been from being banned was because I reported you as a noob on biased and you threatened to temp ban me

Why do you not name the player in question as Viiruselli ???? Or think that keeping him anonymous will make him seem like a fair none rule breaking player coz dude that's just funny as fuck

Yes I am an admin on NwA no I have only ever banned one guy on there server and that was for latting a full friendly trans helicopter on the carrier

So yea you have played this game a year I've been Around a hell of a lot longer and have seen how much shit viirus has caused in this community and yea I am glad NwA admins decided enough is enough and got rid of him again and so is half the pr community

A permanent ban for an allchat insult? How come you don't permanently ban all players without appeal chance who do exactly the same or much worse things on a consistant basis? I feel like you are almost trying to prove my point. Thanks for showing the true face of *NwA*. I get so sick of this PR community sometimes. The abuse of adminrights, the bias, lack of self-reflection. I don't wanna quote the cheesy line from the spiderman movie, but it's so true. Meanwhiles the admin that pushes a permanent ban for an allchat insult admits himself that he was ghosting and sharing intel in allchat and even uses the report function to insult and taunt admins. I can PM you the proof if you wish.

Pathetic and hypocritical. I seriously hope that you reconsider and don't continue this attitude just because you don't have any accountabillity or personal reprecussions for it. If the same standards you apply to others on your server was in some situation applied on yourself you would be outraged.

Midget I have the chatlogs also of course. And I did name the player if you had read the whole post. But the name of the player is completely irrelevant. That's my whole point. What matters is evidence and what has actually happened not your personal opinion of another player. Otherwise there is nothing stopping you from banning everyone you dislike, and sadly I've seen that happen in other occasions and it's very sad that NwA has taken the first step towards this direction.

Also you have been temporarily banned from a PR server for sharing intel in allchat and admitting to ghosting.

https://i.gyazo.com/987be498f284e7738cf2b7643686b16d.png

Yet you want to ban other players permanently for a chat insult. Even though you abuse the report function and admit to ghosting and sharing intel you still wont be permanently banned.

If I suddenly decided to ban every player I dislike and then create imaginary reasons without evidence to justify it...oh boy. You should be happy the same standards you apply on others aren't imposed on yourself.

STompa wrote:Meanwhiles the admin that pushes a permanent ban for an allchat insult admins himself that he was ghosting and sharing intel in allchat and even uses the report function to insult and taunt admins. I can PM you the proof if you wish.

Feel free to post it here.

So where is the evidence I was tempbanned ? I guessed viirus was driving cause yello was getting all the kills not hard to guess really . I've never been banned from any server just accused of ghosting by viirus because I guessed he was driving for yello .

You are currently banned for 1 month on BASED EU & NA for ghosting and abusing the report function to insult and taunt admins.

The vote is ongoing at the moment, but the result is clear. You admitted yourself that you switched sides and then shared intel in allchat. The logs are very clear. Don't act innocent.

Meanwhiles you want to permanently ban other people without chance of appeal for allchat insults and imaginary reasons that you have no evidence to support other than "common hearsay" from people that have a personal grudge. Can you see why this makes my blood boil? Just imagine if the same standards you apply on others was applied to yourself and your own behaviour?

STompa this is heroically unprofessional as a based admin; you should not be publicly talking about how ongoing votes are going, never mind the fact that at least some of what you divulged is not even correct. It's their server that they pay for. If they want to ban people for liking the colour blue that's their decision.
You're welcome to provide feedback on their decisions, but they're just as welcome to not care what you think.

Please let's leave it at that.

Yea the logs are pretty clear sarcasm is lost on you and regards my temp ban on based who wants to celebrate my 1st temp ban in 7 years of pr ??? Party time

I am just providing feedback on their server decisions. I get that they don't have to care, but the public should have a right to know whats going on imo.

Anyways, they asked me for evidence and I provided. Sorry if that's against protocol.

How could I forget about this. You want to permanently ban others for one allchat insult without appeal chance. Yet you do exactly the same thing yourself.



Imagine if your own standards were applied on yourself for once. And still you go around acting like a saint. This whole situation makes me sick.

Yesterday we had the infamous INS-AAS-Vietnam vote again. Luckily vietnam votes got counted towards AAS this time Anyway, i appreciate the amount of votes you do, but i would suggest to do it more like this:
1. INS or AAS
2. Urban, Wood, Desert or Vietnam (pick 3)
3. Map choices

Some other things regarding votes: Sometimes you do them really early into the round which is bad considering some players wont even be there until next round. Further you should be careful with the INS or AAS vote. I noticed that if you played some INS maps in row it is more likely to become INS again. My guess is that the AAS voters left the server by then.

Extending what mats said I keep getting the feeling NWA is the server where I miss the votes most, not sure if its the time for voting is to short or the number of times the message appears is to small but there's many situations where I only see the final count.

And is there any chance of NWA implementing a system for not playing Multiple Insurgency maps in a row? I don't mind the ocasional INS maps but having just two in a row is just a waste of PR time IMO.

[R-DEV]Mats391 wrote:Yesterday we had the infamous INS-AAS-Vietnam vote again. Luckily vietnam votes got counted towards AAS this time Anyway, i appreciate the amount of votes you do, but i would suggest to do it more like this:
1. INS or AAS
2. Urban, Wood, Desert or Vietnam (pick 3)
3. Map choices

Some other things regarding votes: Sometimes you do them really early into the round which is bad considering some players wont even be there until next round. Further you should be careful with the INS or AAS vote. I noticed that if you played some INS maps in row it is more likely to become INS again. My guess is that the AAS voters left the server by then.

Perhaps limiting the variable when a vote is allowed to be made is a good idea, lets say a team has 150 ~ 200 ticket left to initiate a mapvote.

You raise some good points, I will discuss this with the rest of the guys and get this implemented.

[R-CON]UTurista wrote:Extending what mats said I keep getting the feeling NWA is the server where I miss the votes most, not sure if its the time for voting is to short or the number of times the message appears is to small but there's many situations where I only see the final count.

And is there any chance of NWA implementing a system for not playing Multiple Insurgency maps in a row? I don't mind the ocasional INS maps but having just two in a row is just a waste of PR time IMO.

This is something we have discussed in the past, if we were to implement a system like this we would have to keep a balance between both game modes. Something like:

When 2 INS are played in a row force AAS next

When 2 AAS are played in a row force INS next

This is something again that we will need to discuss, we understand that some people dislike Insurgency, but there are also people that dislike AAS so we'll need to find a fair balance here.

Thank you both for leaving feedback!

Pls no more Khamisiyah ins

STompa wrote:How could I forget about this. You want to permanently ban others for one allchat insult without appeal chance. Yet you do exactly the same thing yourself.



Imagine if your own standards were applied on yourself for once. And still you go around acting like a saint. This whole situation makes me sick.

ha ha was that aimed at you ?? hope so


when will you get it threw your thick skull that viirus was banned for multiple offences not just one or are you still unable to read what you have been told multiple times. Also i wasnt the one that banned him i just voted yes but keep flaming me bro you comments just rebound off me. just remember when you want to fire shots dont use rubber bullets

Multiple so called "offences" such as:

"Not playing realisticly"
"Not providing an immersive experience"
"Not teamworking"
"Trying to get as many kills as possible"
"Not providing a theatre of war" (This means playing in a way so it looks cool for others ingame, like flying low with jets for example).

Of course all of this without any evidence or even being close to banworthy offences to begin with.

And 1 tempban in over a year of playing.

Also nice job insulting me. I thought that was a permban-worthy offence in your opinion. Kind of surprised you are from England though since you can barely speak your own native language. But you guys obviously have some imagination. Being able to invent your own language, and also convenient unwritten server rules to make it possible to abuse your admin powers out of personal spite. Real professional. Reminds me of Kopite73. If you actually think these reasons are more legit to permban someone than:
1. Taunting/insulting admins over the report function.
2. Switching sides to gain and then share intel about the enemy team in allchat.

Then you should be glad that you aren't subjected to your own ridiculous standards.

PS. Since you obviously have trouble with the language: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... =hypocrite

Stop the personal attacks or we will have to send you both to a time-out. I suggest to leave it be for now as neither side seems willing to move. Maybe give it another try when everything cooled down a bit.

I would prefer to have a skirmish map as first map again. Right now it is Fallujah which often gets played for full round after crash. Skirmish allows players to join back and then switch to Basrah directly

[R-DEV]Mats391 wrote:I would prefer to have a skirmish map as first map again. Right now it is Fallujah which often gets played for full round after crash. Skirmish allows players to join back and then switch to Basrah directly

This ^^

Enjoy all my times on NWA, probably my favorite Fallujah West 24/7 server out there

Only comment would be number of super admins, a few times over the past month there have been situations where someone needs temp banning, server needs restarting because of squad bug etc. NWA players are on, just not the correct authority to make the change.

Otherwise, some solid wholesome fun that all the family can enjoy!