Project Reality Forums

LiamNL wrote:People are people, not expecting emotions to run high on the internet is just plain stupid, and you clearly said MEC many times, never having referred to it as the Middle East until this post and your post lamenting the Middle East not existing(and don't you go editing your comments now)



And seriously do you have to use the bold and underlined buttons in every single comment you post? Annoying as shit to read.

Chill bro

Is this you....Zektor?

Nah, Zektor can write decent English.

Yep, I have to train more on my english

Just been on a round, where enemy team had 52 kills, and MEC had none.

Maybe the guy is right.........

Imposibble... so many noobs can't be in PR

FlOwMaKeRs wrote:First of all, I meant to ME.

Yes, act as a simpleton when your lack of thought is revealed. He clearly said MEC, not.ME. So here you are still trying to justify it.

Man, the new users lately have brought us some good old DanielNL style posts.

Matrox wrote:Just been on a round, where enemy team had 52 kills, and MEC had none.

Maybe the guy is right.........

How can people be so bad?

Navo wrote:

How can people be so bad?

FlOwMaKeRs wrote:Chill bro

Not your bro, not angry, not annoyed, just disappointed that this has been going for at least 14 pages. And you keep changing your views, it started with horrible long range, then changed to horrible short range, then examples were provided of people using it to great success and you still blame the gun and not the user. And even through most people in this thread have nigh to little of a problem with the weapon you keep insisting that it should be replaced with a AK series which dulls the game down to 2 Russian factions with different camouflage.

Matrox wrote:Just been on a round, where enemy team had 52 kills, and MEC had none.

Maybe the guy is right.........

Just look at the percentage of deaths and wins in the game w/MEC, it's ridiculous. Only APC squad / CAS does something,(Not really) including that it is easy to find an APC in MEC unused.

LiamNL wrote:Not your bro, not angry, not annoyed, just disappointed that this has been going for at least 14 pages. And you keep changing your views, it started with horrible long range, then changed to horrible short range, then examples were provided of people using it to great success and you still blame the gun and not the user. And even through most people in this thread have nigh to little of a problem with the weapon you keep insisting that it should be replaced with a AK series which dulls the game down to 2 Russian factions with different camouflage.

Yeah, this thread became a "changing topic discussion" I found the AK very bad weapon, especially with that stupid scope.

Ofc if you're 0:52 on Kashan it must be because of your standard issue rifle /sarcasm

If you don't mind, I'll go ahead and assume APC Squad got screwed over in the beginning, so MEC Inf ended up facing the wrath of the Bradleys without an appropriate counter. Don't see how an AK Alt kit would've changed that so yeah. Dismissed.

Anything else?

LiamNL wrote:Not your bro, not angry, not annoyed, just disappointed that this has been going for at least 14 pages. And you keep changing your views, it started with horrible long range, then changed to horrible short range, then examples were provided of people using it to great success and you still blame the gun and not the user. And even through most people in this thread have nigh to little of a problem with the weapon you keep insisting that it should be replaced with a AK series which dulls the game down to 2 Russian factions with different camouflage.

I cant understand what you trying to say but yeah, I was upset while writing the post, I may sound confused in the first comments, but my point here is the recoil, literally.

What about getting a tea, and became friends again ? Huh ?

At the beginning, i really hated the G3, thinking inaccurate for all range.
Finally, i think it is a really good weapon for all kind of engagement. Powerful and accurate.

Take your time before the first shoot, you will probably have a one shoot kill. Wait a second before the second if needed. You can't shoot as M16 instantly after spoting a target, as there is more recoil and less ammo on the clip on the G3. Take the advantage of the weapon to adapt you way of playing, engage target when you are crouching and static, avoiding engaging just after running.

For very close range, prefer the no scope shooting, or the iron sigth version of the riffle.

The only bad thing on g3 is the 20 rounds clip, but as the rate of fire is low, it is OK.

The sheetiest weapon is the Famas... Not powerfull, bullet spread everywhere on burst and auto, make it impossible to hit a target at 25m without single shot mode.

qs-racer wrote:
The sheetiest weapon is the Famas... Not powerfull, bullet spread everywhere on burst and auto, make it impossible to hit a target at 25m without single shot mode.

No, the sheetiest weapon ever is AK with scope

I like the G3 and would hate to see it get swapped to the AK. It's strong and accurate. You just have to stay in single-shot unless you're doing CQB (which the Crewman kit's MP5 is so much better at).

FlOwMaKeRs wrote:I cant understand what you trying to say but yeah, I was upset while writing the post, I may sound confused in the first comments, but my point here is the recoil, literally.

You changed your views halfway through the thread, you complained from it being horrible at long range because you don't know how to properly use it to "but cqb is horrible because you don't know what to do in the heat of the moment". It wasn't confused, you even argued that it was a horrible long range rifle, and then enough people said it was one of the best standard issue rifles for long to mid range and you switched your point to it having limited ammo and a slower rate of fire which would make it a useless close range weapon in your opinion (if you'd ask me changing it to an AK would reduce the effective range quite a lot).

Your arguments are invalid because if one is discredited you just abandon it and side with the other side and say the exact opposite, to which people respond with that isn't not that bad in short range either because of it's high damage per shot and providing examples of correct use of the weapon to great success, and yet you persist that the gun is at fault for having a lot of recoil, which is to be expected with such a large calibre round, even through recoil can be compensated for, that's the whole point of keeping your gun on target.

Oh and don't get me started on the whole "the middle east doesn't exist for some reason" **** you started spouting to divert everybodies attention to something else so people wouldn't keep pointing to your own faults in use of the gun instead of the gun itself being bad. Especially as you have referred to it as MEC several times throughout the entire thread, and MEC standing for Middle East Coalition isn't synonymous to the Middle East entirely. The MEC is a fictional faction created to give a generic Middle Eastern military force for the Americans to fight against in vanilla Battlefield 2 and thus your revering to it as the actual middle east is at fault.

And again so you won't mistake this for drama again, this is in act of disappointment, no rage included, I just let it flow a bit too much through.

Can we just all be chill?