Project Reality Forums

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate x64
* CPU : Intel Q6600
* Graphics Card : ATI HD 4870 512MB
* Amount of RAM : 4GB OCZ 1066MHz
* Sound Card : Integrated (mother board)


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1680x1050

* Terrain : Medium
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : Medium
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : Medium
* Anti-Aliasing : Off
* Texture Filtering : Medium




1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

YES


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

~7


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza, Dragon fly, Siege at Ochamachira



4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.


When I jumped in a truck my FPS dropped to ~10 @ Siege at Ochamachira.
When I play Gaza my FPS drop when i look to the W or E.
my FPS lowers at Dragon fly close (harvest?) in E1-2


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

I think I have get some small or big problem at all of the new maps.

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP SP3
* CPU : P4 2.8GHz
* Graphics Card : 8600m 256mb
* Amount of RAM : 4gb
* Sound Card : None

BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 800x600 75Hz

* Terrain : medium
* Effects : medium
* Geometry : medium
* Texture : medium
* Lighting : low
* Dynamic Shadows : low
* Dynamic Light : low
* Anti-Aliasing : 2x
* Texture Filtering : low


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Significantly.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
5


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Fallujah West, Gaza Beach, Beirut


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Seems whenever facing the center of the map performance bombs; facing away from it gets me perfect framerates.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Iron Ridge was fine; most of the old maps (except Fallujah) have no problem.

System Specifications

• Operating System : win 7
• CPU : i7
• Graphics Card :radion 5770 1gb
• Amount of RAM : 6gb
• Sound Card : dunno

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : high

• Terrain : high
• Effects :
• Geometry : high
• Texture :med
• Lighting : high
• Dynamic Shadows :high
• Dynamic Light :high
• Anti-Aliasing :2x
• Texture Filtering :high

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
rubberbanding like crazy


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

6

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

the one with farris wheel

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

not really noticing though i heard looking south doesnt help some people

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with. majority of them.

System Specifications

• Operating System :W7 32 Bit
• CPU :Intel Duo Core 2.33GHz
• Graphics Card :Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS
• Amount of RAM :2GB
• Sound Card :Realtek

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1400X900

• Terrain : Medium
• Effects :Medium
• Geometry :Medium
• Texture :Medium
• Lighting :Medium
• Dynamic Shadows :Medium
• Dynamic Light :Medium
• Anti-Aliasing :4X
• Texture Filtering :Medium

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
A Huge Performance Decrease has made the game unplayable and highly frustrating.
Frame rates start around 30 and rapidly drop to around 15 after 10 minutes in game, and then declining to about an average of 3, 7 frames was my max whilst looking at the sky earlier. I hope my GPU isn't fried.



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
1 (would be 0.2 if that was in the brief)


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Lashkar, Beirut, Yamalia - All of the new ones I have tried, got too frustrated to try any more.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
It's hard to tell where the drop comes from. In previous versions only Korengal valley had a significant frame rate drop on my system, but that was tolerable and playable and I assumed it was due to the masses of dense vegetation and objects. But 0.9 is something else.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Kashan Coop on local server, can play with my regular settings, no issues.

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows 7 32bit
• CPU : Intel DC E8400 3,6Ghz
• Graphics Card : ATi HD4890
• Amount of RAM : 4Gb 800Mhz
• Sound Card :

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1920x1200

• Terrain : high
• Effects : high
• Geometry : high
• Texture : high
• Lighting : high
• Dynamic Shadows : high
• Dynamic Light : high
• Anti-Aliasing : None
• Texture Filtering : high

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes, mostly on new maps. They have too much new objects/details!

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

3

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon Fly, Fallujah West, Gaza, Beirut, Lashkar

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

In "Dragon Fly" i get huge fps drop when in West Fields. Usually 8-10fps around there (Its becouse of the Grass) Also when watching the city from GB base my fps drops from 100fps to 15-20. Trying to play inside of the city is hell.

In "Beirut" That map works pretty good. I got 90-100fps But when in middle of the city and near the beach, houses start dissappearing. No fps drop. Also that tall apartment dissappears. I only see the rooftop and Friendlys/Enemies inside the building.

In "Fallujah" The map just lags like hell compared to the old one.

In "Gaza" When in IDF base it works 90-100fps. But when watching to the city it drops to 10-25fps. Can't play inside the city without horrible fps drop.

In "lashkar Walley" Maintly the map works well. Only when flying over the small city fps drops to 30-40. It's playable.

In "Iron Ridge" The game loves to crash after finishing downloading. The map itself works pretty ok. I just get fps frop near the ferrys wheel. Also All objects w/e are dissappearing around me. Sometimes i dont have ground textures.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All the good ol' maps. Also Silent Eagle(personal fav ) Yamalia, Siege of blabla.. works fine.

And note!

When loading new map, the game crashes more often.
No difference lowering settings to Medium and resolution. There is no better performance beetween medium/high.

I'd cut my wrist instead of playing this game on LOW settings.

Hope to see fix soon.

System Specifications

• Operating System : XP home edition
• CPU :Intel Pentium D
• Graphics Card : RADEON X600 250 MB Hypermemory
• Amount of RAM :2Gb
• Sound Card :SigmaTel Audio (I think?)

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :No idea, I think 1680x1050
  
  Everything else is on low, or off/none. View distance is at 100 though
  
  1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
  Yeah
  
  2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
  4, barely playable
  
  3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
  I only played 3 maps, which all result in poor performance
  1.Yamalia
  2.Gaza Beach
  3.Op Archer
  
  4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
  For Yamalia, it's when I zoom into binoculars
  For Gaza Beacha and Op Archer, it would be in the city, or slums. Once you look away, it's all fine
  
  5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
  Op Archer is fine if I play on local...alone

System Specifications

• Operating System : Vista 32
• CPU : Pentium Dual Core T4200 2GHz
• Graphics Card : Geforce G105M 512mb
• Amount of RAM : 4gb
• Sound Card : Realtek

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1024X768

• Terrain :High
• Effects :High
• Geometry :High
• Texture :Low
• Lighting : Low
• Dynamic Shadows :O ff
• Dynamic Light :O ff
• Anti-Aliasing :O ff
• Texture Filtering :Low

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
-Yes, had some issues on Ramiel and Fallujah before, tho, but not so bad.



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
-5-


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
-Dragon Fly, Gaza, Yamalia

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
-Dragon fly: It differs, but center of map and north end. Its always when you face a certain direction. sometimes its NE-N-NW, sometimes opposite
-Gaza: City center, facing a certain a direction, but it differs as mentioned above.
-Yamalia: Everytime a enemy APC gets close, FPS drops to 10 when using optics on gun, AT etc.. When the apc leaves, everything turns ok.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
-No issues on Silent Eagle so far, small issues on iron ridge, but not played it to much yet.

System Specifications

• Operating System : XP home 32 bit
• CPU : Core two duo E5200? 2.5ghz
• Graphics Card :ASUS 9800GT Hybrid power 512 MB
• Amount of RAM : 2GB ddr2 667mhz
• Sound Card : Onboard

during .87 with 9 on the scale of 1 to 10

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1440x900

• Terrain :high
• Effects :medium
• Geometry :high
• Texture : high
• Lighting : medium
• Dynamic Shadows : medium
• Dynamic Light :medium
• Anti-Aliasing 8
• Texture Filtering :high

Current settings since .9

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1440x900

• Terrain :low
• Effects :low
• Geometry :low
• Texture : low
• Lighting : low
• Dynamic Shadows ff
• Dynamic Light : off
• Anti-Aliasing 2
• Texture Filtering :low

Still experimenting for best results

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

yes: huge
but not as much with new settings ( BUT IT WON'T CUT IT )

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

Varied: always will always has
but 4

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza, Fallujah west , Yamalia ( at distances ), Iron ridge.
Briefly all majorly edited maps and new maps.

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Gaza any where within 100 m of city clears up depending on if near ground level and none tall repeatably stacked buildings

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

.87 ... even quinling worked perfect.
none of the new or edited maps are agreedable, korengal lags also

System Specifications

• Operating System : Win XP Pro
• CPU : AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+
• Graphics Card : nVidia 8600GTSX OC
• Amount of RAM : 2GB
• Sound Card : XFi Fatality Platinum

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1024x768

• Terrain : LOW
• Effects : LOW
• Geometry : LOW
• Texture : LOW
• Lighting : LOW
• Dynamic Shadows : OFF
• Dynamic Light : OFF
• Anti-Aliasing : 4x
• Texture Filtering :LOW

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Significantly -- I used to run on all HIGH settings, now I run everything LOW with CONSTANT rubber-banding and stuttering.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
1


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
It's quite frustrating to attempt to play, I haven't had an opportunity to play a wide variety of maps. Many older maps (Fools Road) run poorly in addition to the new maps.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Off the top of my head -- Operation Dragonfly, I cannot look towards the North-Central section of the map without huge performance drops -- I doesn't matter if my screen is completely obscured by an object, looking towards this region is bad news.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
None.

I posted about this in another forum and offered to post the answer from the people who are too lazy to sign up here.

Bird wrote:
System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows 7 64Bit
• CPU : 2.66GHz Duo
• Graphics Card : 8800GTS 512mb
• Amount of RAM : 4 GB 800Mhz
• Sound Card : Realtek integrated

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1920*1080

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : Medium
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 4X
• Texture Filtering : Full?

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

4-5

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon Fly, Lashkar Valley, Gaza

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Looking towards the center of the map = Lagg

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Think i got a problem with most of the maps, just looking towards the center or in a certain direction(diffrent with every map) makes me lagg alot.

East_Clintwoop wrote:
System Specifications

• Operating System : Vista 32bit
• CPU : Intel e6750
• Graphics Card : HD4850
• Amount of RAM : 4GiB
• Sound Card : Soundmax integrated

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1920*1200

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : Medium
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 4X
• Texture Filtering : Full?

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Aye

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon Fly, Lashkar Valley, Gaza

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Dragon Fly: (opium fields in E1/E2, the area close to it with the bridge in D2/E2 crashes my comp). Lashkar: (looking at middle of map causes fps drop), Gaza: (Looking towards the city, any direction)

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

The rest, (but Beirut seems to crash the servers).

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows 7 64-bit
CPU : Core 2 Quad @ 2.4GHz
Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce GTX 8800 (512mb)
Amount of RAM : 2GB DDR2
Sound Card : Onboard

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1920x1200
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : x8
Texture Filtering : High


Q1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

The lag comes when you get in the cities. IMO, the textures of the new buildings are causing the lag. They need to be optimised.


Q2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

6

Q3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragonfly, Slient Eagle (after 1h of play)

Q4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

City and corn field

Q5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

All the old maps.

I've tried everyting to make PR.9 run on my rig. I've re-installed windows XP 32bit but the game crashed on Drangonfly. With W7 64bit it runs, but lags to hell on Dragonfly and gets laggy after a while on the other new maps. Runs perfectly on old maps. Tried different graphic settings... the only one that makes it ok is taking down the texutre to medium.

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows XP SP3
• CPU : AMD Athlon(tm) 7750 Dual-Core Processor
• Graphics Card : Nvidia GeForce GTS250
• Amount of RAM : 4gb
• Sound Card : Creative Soundblaster X-Fi

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1280x1024

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 8x
• Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

6-7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Beirut, Lashkar Valley, Silent Eagle

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

City areas, Areas with lots of trees/foliage

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

*None*

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows XP64 Service Pack 2
• CPU : AMD X2 4400+
• Graphics Card : Nvidia GTS 250
• Amount of RAM : 4 GB
• Sound Card : Onboard Realtek AC97

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution :1440x900 (Widescreen)

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 8x
• Texture Filtering : High

I also lowered all settings to low/off and reduced view distance to 80% and have the same FPS results

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes- generally about 10% of frames I got as of last accessed test build/ .874

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

1

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Anything with trees, Iron Ridge I get about 1 FPS instead of 40+ during testing.

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Looking towards groups of trees, any area with water results in a slide show.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

None

Vanilla BF2 has been affected by whatever is wrong with PR, I now get 20 FPS or lower in vBF2 after the .909 release where I previously was solidly maxed out at 75 FPS.

System Specifications

• Operating System :Windows XP 32bit SP3
• CPU : intel Core2 duo 3.0ghz
• Graphics Card : NVIDIA 8800 GT
• Amount of RAM : 3GB
• Sound Card : Integrated with motherboard

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1680 X 1050

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : Medium
• Texture : High
• Lighting :High
• Dynamic Shadows :High
• Dynamic Light :High
• Anti-Aliasing :X 4
• Texture Filtering :High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Slight


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
8


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
-Gaza strip
-Iron Ridge
-Lashkar Valley


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
-Gaza: Pretty much facing the bulk of the city I will start to drop some frames and chug slightly
-Iron Ridge: Just generally slower all over, but nothing horrible
-Lashkar Valley: Mainly when up atop a high mountain overlooking the valley I start dropping frames



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Silent Eagle seems to run fine

All Answers in RED

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
• CPU : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+ (2 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
• Graphics Card : ATI Radeon HD 4670
• Amount of RAM : 2GB
• Sound Card : Intergrated with motherboard

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1280 x 1024

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : Medium
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : x8
• Texture Filtering : Medium

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes, alot.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
6


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
All new ones, mainly Gaza, Laskhar and Beirut


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Built up areas mainly, but it mostly all over.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Not known one yet, not played much because of too much lagg. ( I will update asap )

Note:

I can run CODMW2 on all High, I ran PR 0.87 on all high perfect with no lagg with average 90 FPS.

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows Vista 32
• CPU : Intel Core2 Duo T8100 2.10 ghz
• Graphics Card : nVidia GeForce 8400M GS
• Amount of RAM : 3GB
• Sound Card : RealTek HD integrated

BF2 Graphics Settings -- 0.874 and 0.909 respectively

• Resolution : 1024 x 768

• Terrain : Medium
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : Medium
• Dynamic Shadows : Medium
• Dynamic Light : Medium
• Anti-Aliasing : 4x
• Texture Filtering : High

• Resolution : 1024 x 768

• Terrain : Low
• Effects : Medium
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : Medium
• Dynamic Shadows : Low
• Dynamic Light : Low
• Anti-Aliasing : 2x
• Texture Filtering : Medium

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Immediately noticable, yes. Still tweaking settings to keep it looking decent while running just as well, but things aren't moving in the right direction... Even for a middle-to-low end laptop, I can run [on higher settings with respectable FPS] the newer Call of Dutys, and more demanding Source engine games like the Left 4 Deads and Insurgency Mod. I get no stutter, I don't have to sacrifice anti-aliasing, and I sure don't have to reduce my draw distance. This WAS true for 0.874.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
Probably a 3. I'm still working with settings, the game is RELATIVELY playable, but the lower the settings go the more it looks like Desert Combat on a crackpipe budget. Believe me, nobody wants to experience PR at its bare-bones. A lot of people worked very hard on the little details. Having to sacrifice them overnight is pretty heartbreaking.

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Iron Ridge, Fallujah West, Lashkar Valley

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Iron Ridge: The ferris wheel area near the housing projects -- Fallujah West: Consistent stutter map-wide. Not terrible, but noticable enough when everything was smooth a week ago. -- Lashkar Valley: Almost everywhere...It's like moving a camera through molasses sometimes.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Gaza is as close as it comes to giving you a TRUE answer here, but when multiple vehicles are in close proximity, things get choppy. This was never true even on some of the biggest AAS convoys I've ever seen in 0.874. Operation Archer comes in second, but something is still different about the way my computer recognizes it. Nothing is SMOOTH anymore.

System Specifications

• Operating System: Windows 7 RTM 7600 x64 Ultimate
• CPU: Phenom II x3 720 @ 2.8Ghz
• Graphics Card: Shappire HD4850 512MB
• Amount of RAM: 2x2GB Corsair 800Mhz XMS2 (4GB)
• Sound Card: OnBoard Realtek

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution: 1280x1024

• Terrain: High
• Effects: High
• Geometry: High
• Texture: High
• Lighting: High
• Dynamic Shadows: High
• Dynamic Light: High
• Anti-Aliasing: 8xAA
• Texture Filtering: High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes! I lost about 10-30 fps on the old maps.



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8,5


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon Fly
Yamalia
Gaza Beach


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Dragon Fly - When i look to the flowers my FPS drops to 10-15.
Yamalia - When i zoom in my fps drops to 20-25 FPS.
Gaza Beach - When looking to the city, my fps drops to around 28-32.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Silent Eagle
Kashan Desert
Fools Road
Beirut

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows XP SP3
• CPU : Intel Core 2, 6700 @ 2.66, 2,67ghz
• Graphics Card : nVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX 512mb
• Amount of RAM : 2gb
• Sound Card : Realtek HD Audio

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : High

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 8x
• Texture Filtering :High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes, map loading takes much longer time and some times the game CTD's on the loading screen. I do also experience FPS drop on certain insurgency maps that uses the new grass.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
8


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Dragon Fly is unplayable without putting medium on textures.
Fallujah West has huge fps drops
Yamalia lags (fps drops a bit) when running in the swamp, but it's ok as soon as you get back up on land.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Fields that uses the new grass system seems to be the main cause for my fps dropping.
I don't know what specific areas on dragonfly, but sometimes the game CTD's when I'm loading "Objects" (13%/14%)


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Silent Eagle, Iron Ridge, Beirut, Siege at Ochamachira. So far I've only played the new maps so I don't know if I'm lagging on any of the old maps too.

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows 7 Professional 64bit
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 [email protected]
Graphics Card : HD4850 512MB
Amount of RAM : 4GB
Sound Card : Sound Blaster Audigy 4

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1680x1050
Terrain : high
Effects : high
Geometry : high
Texture : high
Lighting : high
Dynamic Shadows : high
Dynamic Light : on
Anti-Aliasing : 4x
Texture Filtering : high

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
9

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Beirut, Kwai River + few other (haven't gotten a chance to play all of them)

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Mostly in air hardware, small lag every few seconds. On some map also in vehicles, but very rare.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Can't to say exactly, havn't chance to test most of maps yet.