Page 8 of 8

Re: Why isnt the chinook armed?

Posted: 2011-10-15 15:54
by Archosaurus
[R-DEV]Eddie Baker wrote:That's a British RAF gunner. M134 is standard on their Chinooks.


Pictures-

Interestingly, they use an M60D as a ramp gun instead of an FN MAG GPMG variant; not sure why. Can any RAF guys shed light on that?

In the US Army they're only on 160th SOAR's MH-47s (like the one in Stealthgato's lower pic), and I haven't heard of any exceptions. Of course, their MH-47s additionally mount M240s in both rear windows and on the ramp. All of the "Big Army" Chinooks I have seen photos of just mount three M240Ds or Hs (front, side-doors/windows and ramp).
I have never seen US chinooks with M134s but at least now I've seen UK units.

Re: Why isnt the chinook armed?

Posted: 2011-10-15 16:30
by Eddie Baker
Archosaurus wrote:I have never seen US chinooks with M134s but at least now I've seen UK units.
Uh, yes, you have. As I said, Stealthgato's last pic is of a US MH-47 Chinook.

Re: Why isnt the chinook armed?

Posted: 2011-10-15 16:35
by Archosaurus
[R-DEV]Eddie Baker wrote:Uh, yes, you have. As I said, Stealthgato's last pic is of a US MH-47 Chinook.
Oh. alright.

Must of missed that one...

Re: Why isnt the chinook armed?

Posted: 2011-10-15 16:42
by tankninja1
There definatly be a M240 in the back ramp every Chinook combat flying ive ever seen has that gun on the back