stabilizers on abrams?

Burlock · Post by **Burlock** » 2008-01-30 11:18

yeh i think these changes will make a big difference but also make tanks better, so im not sure if they want to put it in, if they do i seriously hope they re-balance anti-tank stuff to reflect it. But if this stabalisation is in workign condition i really hope they impliment it.

Mora · Post by **Mora** » 2008-01-30 17:28

Agree the work is already done, the devs only need to copy it into their mod. if its that simple

Serbiak · Post by **Serbiak** » 2008-01-30 17:32

markonymous wrote:maybe we can get some stabilization for 0.71 release? :O

I really like that idea too. If you check the modern battle tanks they all have a stabilisation system so it would just be realistic.

com_kieffer · Post by **com_kieffer** » 2008-01-30 19:01

But tanks already own the way things are, putting stabilizers on would mean that any crew with no comms could actually succesfully engage enmey tanks unlike now where communication is paramount to success.
In other words it would make things to easy in my opinion

Mora · Post by **Mora** » 2008-01-30 19:09

I disagree with you. Tanks should own the battlefield. they are easily takin out by a chopper/plane or HAT crew you just need to know how

and the stabilizer is not working 100% so don't worry too much about it. It would only improof the mod

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2008-01-30 19:10

com_kieffer wrote:But tanks already own the way things are, putting stabilizers on would mean that any crew with no comms could actually succesfully engage enmey tanks unlike now where communication is paramount to success.
In other words it would make things to easy in my opinion

to easy and realistic .

Post by **Mosquill** » 2008-01-30 19:16

com_kieffer wrote:But tanks already own the way things are, putting stabilizers on would mean that any crew with no comms could actually succesfully engage enmey tanks unlike now where communication is paramount to success.
In other words it would make things to easy in my opinion

Not true. I've seen how those stabilizers work, so you'd better belive me.

markonymous · Post by **markonymous** » 2008-01-30 19:17

so.. hows the stabilization working atm?

Post by **Mosquill** » 2008-01-30 19:43

markonymous wrote:so.. hows the stabilization working atm?

not perfectly...

Have you seen the video?

markonymous · Post by **markonymous** » 2008-01-30 19:53

Mosquill wrote:not perfectly...

Have you seen the video?

i have been trying to find the link but i havent found it. mind posting it?

Post by **Mosquill** » 2008-01-30 20:25

markonymous wrote:i have been trying to find the link but i havent found it. mind posting it?

Sure, here's the most recent video:YouTube - Project Reality Vehicle Stabilizers

Zealot · Post by **Zealot** » 2008-01-31 06:13

Mosquill wrote:Sure, here's the most recent video:YouTube - Project Reality Vehicle Stabilizers

Ok.

I want this.

ASAP.

Looks like it would add significantly to the gameplay experience, covering both the fun- and realism factor.

*crosses fingers* ...patch, maybe?

//

Post by **MAINERROR** » 2008-01-31 17:12

Awesome work especially on the helicopter!

Mora · Post by **Mora** » 2008-01-31 17:28

Maybe we should get a poll running with who want it to be implanted and who not.

Post by **Masaq** » 2008-01-31 17:38

*Sigh* The stabiliser is a good piece of work. I like it, I'd like to see it in-game.

However:

It won't go into PR unless the DEVs want it to go into PR.

Polls on whether or not it should go in are pointless - as has been said many times before, the Devs are making this game with their own interests at heart. Just because 60, 70, 80% of the forums might say they want to see it in it doesn't mean they would add it.

Is it worth adding, in my opinion? Absolutely.
Do I think it WILL get added, in time? Yes.
Do I think that frequent posts about how "the Devs never respond to suggestions and ignore the community's wishess" will acheive anything? No.

PR isn't a democractic community. Hate to say it like that, but it's as simple as I can make it.

Mora · Post by **Mora** » 2008-01-31 18:10

Alright i understand..

Post by **Masaq** » 2008-01-31 18:13

K. Sorry to sound like a git, I'm honestly not just being a grouchy old man - it's just how things are.

Top_Cat_AxJnAt · Post by **Top_Cat_AxJnAt** » 2008-01-31 19:12

[R-MOD]Masaq wrote: PR isn't a democractic community. Hate to say it like that, but it's as simple as I can make it.

Too true becuase it is quite clearly communist!

Spaz · Post by **Spaz** » 2008-02-04 16:03

I see no reason to not put it ingame

But from the video it dosn't seem to work that good.