Page 9 of 11

Posted: 2008-01-30 11:18
by Burlock
yeh i think these changes will make a big difference but also make tanks better, so im not sure if they want to put it in, if they do i seriously hope they re-balance anti-tank stuff to reflect it. But if this stabalisation is in workign condition i really hope they impliment it.

Posted: 2008-01-30 17:28
by Mora
Agree the work is already done, the devs only need to copy it into their mod. if its that simple :mrgreen:

Posted: 2008-01-30 17:32
by Serbiak
markonymous wrote:maybe we can get some stabilization for 0.71 release? :O :D
I really like that idea too. If you check the modern battle tanks they all have a stabilisation system so it would just be realistic.

Posted: 2008-01-30 19:01
by com_kieffer
But tanks already own the way things are, putting stabilizers on would mean that any crew with no comms could actually succesfully engage enmey tanks unlike now where communication is paramount to success.
In other words it would make things to easy in my opinion

Posted: 2008-01-30 19:09
by Mora
I disagree with you. Tanks should own the battlefield. they are easily takin out by a chopper/plane or HAT crew you just need to know how ;) and the stabilizer is not working 100% so don't worry too much about it. It would only improof the mod :)

Posted: 2008-01-30 19:10
by 77SiCaRiO77
com_kieffer wrote:But tanks already own the way things are, putting stabilizers on would mean that any crew with no comms could actually succesfully engage enmey tanks unlike now where communication is paramount to success.
In other words it would make things to easy in my opinion
to easy and realistic .

Posted: 2008-01-30 19:16
by Mosquill
com_kieffer wrote:But tanks already own the way things are, putting stabilizers on would mean that any crew with no comms could actually succesfully engage enmey tanks unlike now where communication is paramount to success.
In other words it would make things to easy in my opinion
Not true. I've seen how those stabilizers work, so you'd better belive me. ;)

Posted: 2008-01-30 19:17
by markonymous
so.. hows the stabilization working atm?

Posted: 2008-01-30 19:43
by Mosquill
markonymous wrote:so.. hows the stabilization working atm?
not perfectly...

Have you seen the video?

Posted: 2008-01-30 19:53
by markonymous
Mosquill wrote:not perfectly...

Have you seen the video?
i have been trying to find the link but i havent found it. mind posting it? :roll:

Posted: 2008-01-30 20:25
by Mosquill
markonymous wrote:i have been trying to find the link but i havent found it. mind posting it? :roll:
Sure, here's the most recent video:YouTube - Project Reality Vehicle Stabilizers

Posted: 2008-01-31 06:13
by Zealot
Mosquill wrote:Sure, here's the most recent video:YouTube - Project Reality Vehicle Stabilizers
Ok.

I want this.

ASAP.

Looks like it would add significantly to the gameplay experience, covering both the fun- and realism factor.

*crosses fingers* ...patch, maybe?

//

Posted: 2008-01-31 17:12
by MAINERROR
Awesome work especially on the helicopter!

Posted: 2008-01-31 17:28
by Mora
Maybe we should get a poll running with who want it to be implanted and who not.

Posted: 2008-01-31 17:38
by Masaq
*Sigh* The stabiliser is a good piece of work. I like it, I'd like to see it in-game.

However:

It won't go into PR unless the DEVs want it to go into PR.

Polls on whether or not it should go in are pointless - as has been said many times before, the Devs are making this game with their own interests at heart. Just because 60, 70, 80% of the forums might say they want to see it in it doesn't mean they would add it.

Is it worth adding, in my opinion? Absolutely.
Do I think it WILL get added, in time? Yes.
Do I think that frequent posts about how "the Devs never respond to suggestions and ignore the community's wishess" will acheive anything? No.

PR isn't a democractic community. Hate to say it like that, but it's as simple as I can make it.

Posted: 2008-01-31 18:10
by Mora
Alright i understand..

Posted: 2008-01-31 18:13
by Masaq
K. Sorry to sound like a git, I'm honestly not just being a grouchy old man - it's just how things are.

Posted: 2008-01-31 19:12
by Top_Cat_AxJnAt
[R-MOD]Masaq wrote: PR isn't a democractic community. Hate to say it like that, but it's as simple as I can make it.
Too true becuase it is quite clearly communist! :wink:

Posted: 2008-02-04 16:03
by Spaz
I see no reason to not put it ingame :P

But from the video it dosn't seem to work that good.