ah *looks around for escape* what video?[R-DEV]Chuc wrote:Actually can you point on the weapon where the pin is? (or even better you do it in that *coughvideocough*)
mate, please state if you are or have been in the armed forces, cuz both Tonnie and Slouch are active/recently active servicemen. Don't doubt their knowledge of these weapons unless you can back it up lad.ok one first thing.. thats not a conflict - its a discussion...
Textures WIP mate lolDr2B Rudd wrote:mate, please state if you are or have been in the armed forces, cuz both Tonnie and Slouch are active/recently active servicemen. Don't doubt their knowledge of these weapons unless you can back it up lad.
On the model front, http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/649/23612675.jpg
why is it green, I've wondered. Hollywood tells me its night vision
I wasnt trying to be an *** or anything, my point is... is that the two pics are two diffrent versions of the original AUG Styer and that he says we use that same rifle as they do wich is not correct as they have many diffrences...qaiex wrote:Yeah, that picture comparison wasn't biased or anything, tonnie. ;D
Be nice to the austrians, after all, they made the rifle.
This Austrian StG 77 looks more like the australian one.
Same flash suppressor, barrel length, rounded ironsights, barrel release stud and a different gas system.
i could understand every single word.
^^ok sweet now with all that sorted lolLyRiCs wrote:no problem, your german wasnt soo bad
i did not mean that the australian army uses an aug which modded by austria...
i think the actual version of the STG77 in my county (austria) is since a long time a new one... and THIS new one, looks very close to the australian one...
i think it was a missunderstood--- im sry for that!!
whatever... its not the same version =)
but very close
austrialians are very "touchy" (i hope its the right word... xD) in this thing... me too ^^
i think, everyone who was at his army, is very touchy in this thing... let us stop the discussing here, the first point was only that i would like to know how firemode switching will be work.
im really impressed about your work and i cant whait to play with the australian version of the AUG.. ok its not the Austrians but its even more the austria-stg77 then a m16
soo... guys im sry for the missunderstanding situation which i created with my creepy english... whish you a nice day, i will follow this thread till we can get the australian army into PR
have a nice day,
greetings from sunny austria @26° Celsius
MITHS mate...Truism wrote:The firemode selector, afaik, was mostly introduced as a result of experiences with first generation M16s in Vietnam, for many of the same reasons automatic M16s were phased out in favour of Single Shot/Burst Fire by the US.
Two problems.
The possibility existed that if a soldier was shot while depressing the trigger, he could leave it depressed as he fell, potentially shooting squadmates. A lockout can help prevent this from happening.
The second problem was that not having a lockout can make fire control difficult, particularly with less well disciplined troops. At the moment the ADF maintains very high levels of training and proficiency and is a completely voluntary force, but it was learnt during Vietnam that the assumptions you make about the sort of soldiers you will have need to be flexible because political decisions have the ability to force your hand.
Finally, the Steyr doesn't perform well on automatic at all. I've heard stories about barrels failing from only a few magazines being put through them on automatic. This is aside from the fact that every bullet after about the second or third is going to go somewhere you didn't want it to.
Hahah, you didn't use the old excuse "But they Steyr needs carbon to work, sir!" like we did? Not that it ever worked for us.[R-CON]tonnie15 wrote:The f88 is quite a reliable weapon if cleaned and maintained correctly (Ohhhh the hrs of cleaning carbon in and around everything oh god brings shivers down the spine)
