Page 10 of 14

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-07 20:09
by Infantry1242
I joined cause Rebiv left....thank god,hes somewhere roaming looking for a clan that will make him instantly admin (lol).

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-11 00:32
by HARRISON1973
Infantry1242 wrote:I joined cause Rebiv left....thank god,hes somewhere roaming looking for a clan that will make him instantly admin (lol).
And we're glad to have you.

We were afraid of how the PR community would take us kicking Rebiv out. I figured it would be 50/50 between good and bad responses, but I have had nothing but good remarks about this move. We have even had a few members come back because of it and our server is doing well. I was surprisingly shocked to see the support we had. My xfire goes nuts when we get full from people asking for a spot in the server.

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-11 00:58
by Infantry1242
HARRISON1973 wrote:And we're glad to have you.

We were afraid of how the PR community would take us kicking Rebiv out. I figured it would be 50/50 between good and bad responses, but I have had nothing but good remarks about this move. We have even had a few members come back because of it and our server is doing well. I was surprisingly shocked to see the support we had. My xfire goes nuts when we get full from people asking for a spot in the server.
Thats good,TAR is like the best IMO next to NwA and UKWF. im mah list its this:

1st:TAR NUMBER ONE!!

2nd:NwA

3rd:UKWF

4th: =]H[=

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-11 01:57
by Trognar
TG....then UKWF for me, Infantry why dont you just talk in game at all? Much easier, and I dont care how soft your voice is lol, TAR is a good server too, usualy Im on it if im not on UKWF. Just sometimes you get those noobs who believe it is a training server in deployment -.-

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-11 03:06
by Infantry1242
Trognar wrote:TG....then UKWF for me, Infantry why dont you just talk in game at all? Much easier, and I dont care how soft your voice is lol, TAR is a good server too, usualy Im on it if im not on UKWF. Just sometimes you get those noobs who believe it is a training server in deployment -.-
i know,ive had 12 people talking to me in my CAS squad on =]H[= saying "Can you teach my how to fly a PR A-10,im a ace in vBF2" and im like "GO TO A FCKING TRAINING SERVER"
Oh,and my mics never transmit,GRRRRRR stupid voip..

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-11 06:26
by goguapsy
Just had so much fun on this server with some great people!

Thanks!



BTW... Painster, post the recordings on youtube I wanna see them :D

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-12 00:38
by 0331SgtSpyUSMC
I had a game with my fried a few days ago and I have to say ... I had a awesome time on this server. You will always run into people that will complain, don't let them keep you down, you doing a great job. I want to thank HARRISON1973 and everyone behind him for getting that server on track. Thanks man. See you in my sights soon

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-12 23:58
by HARRISON1973
0331SgtSpyUSMC wrote:I had a game with my fried a few days ago and I have to say ... I had a awesome time on this server. You will always run into people that will complain, don't let them keep you down, you doing a great job. I want to thank HARRISON1973 and everyone behind him for getting that server on track. Thanks man. See you in my sights soon
Thanks man!

And when you finally see me in your sights, I'll already be aiming at your left testicle!

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-13 14:33
by Wh33lman
Well, now that Rebiv is gone, i may venture back in. is Shughartism still there?

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA MIXED (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-13 21:40
by goguapsy
smirnoFFzz wrote:Anyone that knows me, and isn't scared of the truth or someone who is blunt will tell you that I thoroughly research before I take upon anything like this.
What are you talking about? Look at your post count!

OK OK I know what was uneeded.


On-Topic, though, I would like to ask while the no base-rape in Lashkar Valley rule... In the end (Friday or Saturday) of a round, the entire insurgent team was defending the 2 caches near their main. The brits were unable to move. Why isn't it allowed to baserape in such situations (ie. "Last 2 flags" for the insurgent/Taliban team?)

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA MIXED (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-14 01:40
by HARRISON1973
goguapsy wrote: On-Topic, though, I would like to ask while the no base-rape in Lashkar Valley rule... In the end (Friday or Saturday) of a round, the entire insurgent team was defending the 2 caches near their main. The brits were unable to move. Why isn't it allowed to baserape in such situations (ie. "Last 2 flags" for the insurgent/Taliban team?)
Not quite sure I get your question but here's my attempt at a response:

Caches do not count as flags, the mains on insurgency maps are off limits for opposing teams respectively. Insurgents have a main where the majority of their assets spawn and as a last spawn when no other caches or FOB's are available. Allied main is attack-able by bomb cars/bomb trucks only. The only thing allied forces are allowed to attack are caches.

I think you want to know why insurgents are not allowed to attack allied main when they are down to 2 caches. The reason is simple, most people hate being camped at their main. Our server has done well with this rule and the vast majority of people like it. It offers a safe place for both sides to regroup. If you want to try to add stress to the allied side, you can use the bomb car rule to cut off assets, supplies, and troop regrouping to break up the final assault on your caches. This causes a squad or asset to remain at main in defense mode which keeps group troops limited in a coordinated attack.

Did that help?

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-14 01:46
by HARRISON1973
Wh33lman wrote:is Shughartism still there?
He shows up from time to time along with other =SB= guys. I know some people have had a problem with them in the past and we have tightened our leash on them but they are always welcome in our TS and server as long as they remain civil.

If anyone has a problem with anyone in our TS or server when an admin is not on, PM me. I need to know.

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-19 01:19
by Infantry1242
Hey harrison,maybe we should do a event night,Saturday night.i dunno,ill xfire you.

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA MIXED (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-20 16:01
by goguapsy
HARRISON1973 wrote:Not quite sure I get your question but here's my attempt at a response:

Caches do not count as flags, the mains on insurgency maps are off limits for opposing teams respectively. Insurgents have a main where the majority of their assets spawn and as a last spawn when no other caches or FOB's are available. Allied main is attack-able by bomb cars/bomb trucks only. The only thing allied forces are allowed to attack are caches.

I think you want to know why insurgents are not allowed to attack allied main when they are down to 2 caches. The reason is simple, most people hate being camped at their main. Our server has done well with this rule and the vast majority of people like it. It offers a safe place for both sides to regroup. If you want to try to add stress to the allied side, you can use the bomb car rule to cut off assets, supplies, and troop regrouping to break up the final assault on your caches. This causes a squad or asset to remain at main in defense mode which keeps group troops limited in a coordinated attack.

Did that help?
Yeah makes sense. I was just saying, it delayed the game by a LOT.

Whatabout vertical baserape? (ie. Lynx hovering over main?)

:)

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA MIXED (North America)

Posted: 2010-09-20 17:42
by HARRISON1973
goguapsy wrote:Yeah makes sense. I was just saying, it delayed the game by a LOT.

Whatabout vertical baserape? (ie. Lynx hovering over main?)

:)
Rule #8
8. Do not attack any Main Base unless it is the last flag. If it is uncapturabe, you will not attack it period. This includes aircraft or area strikes.

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-10-03 17:01
by HARRISON1973
We have updated our rules, please be advised!



Major changes include:

*Added "CROW and TOW HMMWV to reserved asset list."

*Added "Do not leave trans vehicles in the field."

*Removed "Team Switch rule"

*Removed "Engineer and LAT kit restrictions on Insurgency maps."

*Removed "AA vehicle restriction, this can now be soloed."


Please read our complete rule listing HERE!

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-10-04 00:47
by Silly_Savage
*Added "Do leave trans vehicles in the field."
I hope that was supposed to say, "Do not leave trans vehicles in the field."

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-10-04 02:11
by HARRISON1973
Silly_Savage wrote:I hope that was supposed to say, "Do not leave trans vehicles in the field."
Umm... :o ops:

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-10-04 04:56
by Uthric
we has free cookies from 10 PM to 4 AM ever night :arrow: its that away to the sever

Re: ]TAR[ TEXAS USA (North America)

Posted: 2010-10-16 04:25
by dragunover
All player bans except PB bans are gone from our new server