Page 2 of 2
Re: Too much of a good thing???
Posted: 2011-08-03 01:32
by Vege
Demigod bless the 3D era with 120hz monitors
Tasting the smoothness of over 60hz after I'm never going back.
We can abandon our CRT:s now.
Re: Too much of a good thing???
Posted: 2011-08-03 02:48
by Murphy
42" makes that ten pixel target awfully big, but I agree that smaller screens provide a better image.
Re: Too much of a good thing???
Posted: 2011-08-04 16:47
by Mikemonster
Vege wrote:Demigod bless the 3D era with 120hz monitors
Tasting the smoothness of over 60hz after I'm never going back.
We can abandon our CRT:s now.
Smells like win.
I'm lazy, how much do you have to pay these days for a 120Hz monitor that doesn't motion-blur and has good viewing angles?
Re: Too much of a good thing???
Posted: 2011-08-04 17:37
by saXoni
I tried playing PR on a 42". The only difference was the color. It was a lot worse.
Re: Too much of a good thing???
Posted: 2011-08-04 17:52
by Pedz
Mikemonster wrote:Smells like win.
I'm lazy, how much do you have to pay these days for a 120Hz monitor that doesn't motion-blur and has good viewing angles?
No such 120hz monitor with "good" viewing angles ( I assume you mean viewing angles on par to IPS screens?
But a 120hz monitor can set you back ?180(1680x1050 res)-?560(Samsung s27a950d worth it =]).
But normally the mid range ones are ?300-?400
Re: Too much of a good thing???
Posted: 2011-08-04 21:19
by Mikemonster
Still out of my budget then, cheers pedz. I'm presuming then that the two advantages of 120Hz technology is that it doesn't tire your eyes [as much] and because of the ffaster refresh rate has faster responding pixels?
Actually i'll google it, cheers fo the info.
EDIT: 'Tis an interesting read -
http://www.overclock.net/monitors-displ ... ained.html