Except making an engagement more realistic, 50 soldiers on each side and the size of the conflicts on the map is far from realistic. of course making it fun to play is in the bigger picture. I think as previous poster it has to grow on the playerbase before fully accepted and learn how th deal with the new problems.Mauser GDog wrote:I have to admit, I kind of agree with this. I don't feel 100 player servers have done anything to really improve PR. In fact, I've been considering hosting a dedicated server since 1.0 came out and I think a 64 player server would be very popular...
IF you take another game not close to this: Counterstrike, I remember when they put a shield in that game everyone got furious and sad it was horrible and son...it was removed from lots of servers cause people didnt want to learn how to engage it with new tactics.
I dont say its wrong to feel that way..I personally just think its good with the developement.
