Project Reality Forums

Mauser GDog wrote:I have to admit, I kind of agree with this. I don't feel 100 player servers have done anything to really improve PR. In fact, I've been considering hosting a dedicated server since 1.0 came out and I think a 64 player server would be very popular...

Except making an engagement more realistic, 50 soldiers on each side and the size of the conflicts on the map is far from realistic. of course making it fun to play is in the bigger picture. I think as previous poster it has to grow on the playerbase before fully accepted and learn how th deal with the new problems.

IF you take another game not close to this: Counterstrike, I remember when they put a shield in that game everyone got furious and sad it was horrible and son...it was removed from lots of servers cause people didnt want to learn how to engage it with new tactics.
I dont say its wrong to feel that way..I personally just think its good with the developement.

Raklodder wrote:Then you have no issues, if I where to explain to you, that Project Reality will forever remain a computer game?

It seems that you have far more issues when you write like that.

Raklodder wrote:Then you have no issues, if I where to explain to you, that Project Reality will forever remain a computer game?

What do you mean by this? I don't understand what you are trying to say.

Ushiri wrote:It seems that you have far more issues when you write like that.

Mrslobodan wrote:What do you mean by this? I don't understand what you are trying to say.

My point is that it does not matter how real you make Project Reality, it will remain a computer game.