Project Reality Forums

The HJ_8 reticule is the perfect one for ATGMs.

400 m TOW vs Tank





800m TOW vs Tank

Bringerof_D wrote:i'm fine with the lack of zoom as it is. the only change i want is for thinner crossheirs on the TOW. fix that and everything else is fine.

The lack of zoom is a bug, not a feature. That is what needs to be fixed.

Kerryburgerking wrote:The HJ_8 reticule is the perfect one for ATGMs.

And why should the DEVs put the HJ8 reticle on every ATGM? Should they put the Bradley reticle on the Warrior?

Pretty sure he means the width of it, and how it isn't a fat blob like the TOW reticule...

Eddie Baker wrote:And why should the DEVs put the HJ8 reticle on every ATGM? Should they put the Bradley reticle on the Warrior?

i dont think he's saying put THAT reticle on the others. rather use that reticle as the benchmark for the thickness of the lines towards the center of the regular TOW reticle

Eddie Baker wrote:The lack of zoom is a bug, not a feature. That is what needs to be fixed.



And why should the DEVs put the HJ8 reticle on every ATGM? Should they put the Bradley reticle on the Warrior?

I never said that, i just mean it is the perfect one.

Kerryburgerking wrote:The HJ_8 reticule is the perfect one for ATGMs.

Only thing is that the HJ 8 reticule in that photo is the reticule for the vehicle the deploy able HJ 8 that a player can place at a FOB has the same reticule as the BGM-71

Nice to see there's a thread about this. So it's a bug then I guess, atleast by eddie's words?

If not, explanation needed. Having ATGM/TOW weapons that IRL have zoom without the ability to do so is plain unrealistic and renders them useless.