Posted: 2007-01-02 17:14
What Forgotten Hope did (the first one for BF1942) was to divide their mod into 3 different parts, so if one download was corrupted, you wouldn't have to download the whole mod over again.
I don't see how 0.56 of a floppy disk would be helpful at all...bullit_toof wrote:It sounds as if copying the entire to game to 1180.56 floppy disks, then sending them to each individual user, would be quicker than rapidshare.![]()
Well the remaining 44% remaing disk space (or 0.6336MB) can be used for pretty pictures of you and the team.'[R-DEV wrote:e-Gor']I don't see how 0.56 of a floppy disk would be helpful at all...
Thats why we need newsgroups!happydan wrote:some of us are on traffic shaping ISPs so torrents are flakey.
Here is a review on 2 good ones:
File Sharing Just got that much Better with DivShare-
http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12...t-much-better/
MediaFire: Way Better Than RapidShare For Sharing Files-
http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10...sharing-files/
If this is true - why are 'scene' releases still cut up in alot of .RARs? :Skurtmax_0 wrote:Torrents are the best. You simply can't get a corrupted torrent download. Torrents download in chunks actually (depending on the tracker), but normally between 1-5mb chunks. Each chunk is checked for consistency and thrown out if it's invalid.
This is much better than cut up RARs. If you have an invalid RAR file you first have to find the one with the problem, then go back and manually download that part and hope it works...
If you can't use Bittorrent then don't ***** about it. It's YOUR choice to support an ISP that blocks ports and whatnot.
Because they don't use BitTorrent for their internal distribution?huleboeren wrote:If this is true - why are 'scene' releases still cut up in alot of .RARs? :S
foodmaniac2003 wrote:What Forgotten Hope did (the first one for BF1942) was to divide their mod into 3 different parts, so if one download was corrupted, you wouldn't have to download the whole mod over again.
That'd be confusing to a lot of people. And you're still gonna get the same file so why not the whole thing at once without delay? If you search port forward in the P.R. forums, you will find a thread by me that tells you how to port forward and you will get similar, if not faster downloads than direct downloadManic Sidewinder wrote:I personally would like to see the download files in increments of 750MB.
Whats confusing with : Part A, Part B, & Part C ?SGT.Collado wrote:That'd be confusing to a lot of people. And you're still gonna get the same file so why not the whole thing at once without delay? If you search port forward in the P.R. forums, you will find a thread by me that tells you how to port forward and you will get similar, if not faster downloads than direct download