Posted: 2007-03-12 15:27
no, it would be better to have the middle/heavy MGs as requestable kits
Unless I'm defending from high ground, I always prefer hand thrown nades to the UGL. I can judge the range better, they seem more accurate, I can toss them consistently over walls and around corners, and they are just much more predictable. Unfortunately you only get two.00SoldierofFortune00 wrote:I agree, though there is really no need for 1 grenadier/rifleman kit as everyone would choose the grenadier.
There's a work around? This could be huge if possible. Different weapons/grenades/etc for each kit.Maxfragg wrote:EOD showed us at least, that differnent unlocks for each faction are possible and i think their way to have them always unlockt seems to be a good one
Im not sure for the US and other army's, but overhere in the Dutch we have Combat Life Savers, and they are just regular infantry ( speaking of Infantry platoons / groups), the only difference is that have to carry a extra backpack full of bandages and stuff. They still use the basic infantry weapon. ( overhere the C7A1)Guerra wrote: So for a medic, instead of that M16, perhaps something smaller like a submachine gun, instead of a shotgun, a submachine gun for engineer, and such. Or instead of M16 with under slug, M16 with a scope.
That would be great!Maxfragg wrote:hm, but is there a realistic way to bring back the SMGs? I really miss them, but how should it be done?
a kind of sabotage soldier with c4 and a silenced SMG as requestable kit would be cool, a kind of spezialliced SpecOp with weaker gun and better (or more) explosives and no pistol