Page 2 of 3
Posted: 2007-05-06 00:46
by youm0nt
ryan d ale wrote:I've been away from the forums for a long time...miltia faction?
Yup, you have been gone for a while...
Check the PR 0.6 changelog, it's still WIP and check the guide for more updates
Posted: 2007-05-06 00:48
by wpchen
Red Bull doesn't need wings to make you fly. It empowers you to do so yourself.
Posted: 2007-05-06 09:20
by Jedimushroom
NO MORE AK101S!
NO MORE GLS!
LEARN YOUR LESSON DEVS!!!!!!
Posted: 2007-05-06 09:22
by arthuro12
the shit he's holding a smokebnomb .. (i thinkz0rs)
Posted: 2007-05-06 09:23
by Mongolian_dude
ub3rxn00b wrote:Devs don't have time for anything. It makes you wonder what they're really getting done.
Luckly, as a tester i can sleep well at night because i know what they are focusing on is ground breaking and altering gameplay, as opposed to the pure asthetics of it all. Asthetics only RLY need to looked at at about .99999999
...mongol...
Posted: 2007-05-06 09:47
by Outlawz7
77SiCaRiO77 wrote:AFAIk , devs dont have time to make models of new factions , so yeah ,they will be the one from SF
EDIT: OMG

Is that a beer can or Molotov?
Posted: 2007-05-06 10:06
by bosco_
^
Redbull can.
(The player can fly after drinking it.)
Posted: 2007-05-06 10:50
by ryan d ale
youm0nt wrote:Yup, you have been gone for a while...
Check the PR 0.6 changelog, it's still WIP and check the guide for more updates
Thanks for the link

Posted: 2007-05-06 12:48
by Semi
Heh... you really threw realism out the window by adding the PPSh.
Posted: 2007-05-06 13:23
by bosco_
Uhm... no.
There are US soldiers in Iraq who used the PPSh.
So shut it please.
Posted: 2007-05-06 13:33
by Wattershed
bosco wrote:Uhm... no.
There are US soldiers in Iraq right now who use the PPSh.
So shut it please.
Sure whatever. But I hate to see 7 different weapons with all different kinds of ammo. Don't see the good in that... cant rearm each other and it will be a pain in the *** to get all the ammo to all the different weapons..
By the way, the can seems to be a pepper spay can. The first letters on it is pep..
Posted: 2007-05-06 13:36
by bosco_
Don't believe it?

Posted: 2007-05-06 13:42
by Wattershed
bosco wrote:Don't believe it?

I believe you! Ive seen those pics before! But read the rest of my post please.
Posted: 2007-05-06 14:02
by Semi
bosco wrote:Uhm... no.
There are US soldiers in Iraq who used the PPSh.
So shut it please.
Uhm... yes, kiddo.
We have all seen those pictures, but what does it prove? You're judging the availability of the weapon by 2 pictures of the same scene.
If we follow your way of thinking The US should get PPSh's instead if M16's on all maps, because that's what the pictures show, right?

Posted: 2007-05-06 14:05
by eddie
I'm sorry.... I came into this topic expecting to see a conversation about "Militia player models" as the title suggests. What is all this **** about the US using the PPSh?
Posted: 2007-05-06 14:57
by bosco_
That guy claims that adding the PPsh to the Militia would ruin the realism in PR, and I told him that its not unrealistic and that the Insurgents in Iraq use them too (from which the US soldiers on the pictures got them).
Now he's trying to distract from his idiotic statement before.
Posted: 2007-05-06 15:00
by eddie
PPSh should be put in for the Milita. I have no idea why they wouldn't.
Posted: 2007-05-06 15:01
by Outlawz7
R-Devs should leak screenshots taken from BFR, so no weapons on them except the ones, they'd like community to see

Posted: 2007-05-06 16:19
by Chuffy
Just wondering, why would a US soldier be using a PPSh? Did he lose his M16?

Posted: 2007-05-06 16:20
by bosco_
They are still top for room-clearing and CQB.
Also, notice that he has his M16 with him.