put us back!!!

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
CAS_117
Posts: 1600
Joined: 2007-03-26 18:01

Post by CAS_117 »

You can't ignore how popular Al Basrah was in 0.5, but reality is reality.
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Post by Viper5 »

Army Ranger, the GB Faction replaced the US Faction on Basrah for realism purposes, as IRL the Brits are responsible for the Basrah area in Iraq. US was never intended to stay, but was a placeholder until heavier British assets were developed. Also, please refrain from demands, as you will likely be met with some unfriendly remarks and possibly a few pissed off DEVs.
Gangrene
Posts: 20
Joined: 2007-05-18 15:37

Post by Gangrene »

ARMY RANGER wrote:PUT USMC AND ARMY BACK ON AL ABASHAR you guys put brits? wtf is wrong with you there is already plenty brit need more us on desert maps and shit :x :x :x :x :x
I happen to enjoy it more playing the British. I like the variety and I'm looking forward to the Canadian, Polish, Russian, and US Army forces if the DEVs feel they are worth adding to the mod. Try to show some respect or at least some manners.
Dylan
Posts: 3798
Joined: 2006-05-29 00:41

Post by Dylan »

Locking. Please make your threads more constructive in the future. Thank you.
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”