Posted: 2007-08-20 18:01
Eh? I thought I'd replied?! *Goes to investigate*
Project Reality Forums
Heavy Support
Page 2 of 2
Posted: 2007-08-20 18:19
How about instead of a .50cal, put in a M240 MG. I'm sure its been suggested before, but it makes a lot more sense than lugging around Ma-duce
Posted: 2007-08-20 18:57
Actually Canada does have certain personell qualified to operate the M2 in certain conditions. Usually no, they don't use it dismounted. But during a large engagement, it might be brought out to provide a base of fire.Top_Cat_AxJnAt wrote:The machine gun shown in the 2 picture is the M2 Browning Machne gun. It weighs 58 kg with the tripod (that is over 100 pounds). How many soldiers do you know who would be willing too OR even can carry such a heavy weapon around for long periods of time.
Posted: 2007-08-20 19:16
From the website of my local infantry reserves unit.
C6 GPGM Team - minimum two Corporal/Privates
Posted: 2007-08-20 20:01
Oh I know. Just Reaffirming it. The M240 would be wicked. Even if it couldn't be a "kit", maybe deploy it on a commander asset like in the window of a bunker or on a sandbag line. What can I say, Me likes big machineguns[R-PUB]Garabaldi wrote:Read the last post of the first page and the second page of this thread