Posted: 2007-09-30 05:07
you miss the point .
PD: FH= forgotten hope , its a mod ...
PD: FH= forgotten hope , its a mod ...
So say the US armor will rape MEC armor, US airforce will rape MEC airforce and US infantry will destroy MEC infantry.77SiCaRiO77 wrote:afaik , FH shermans where raped by panzers all the time and i didnt hear a complain about that .
I think it's because it only needed one person to drive/fire a tank in the mod and plus the Shermans respawned quickly. Also, I think I remember the Shermans outnumbered the German tanks on each map, with a ratio, but I'm not sure...77SiCaRiO77 wrote:afaik , FH shermans where raped by panzers all the time and i didnt hear a complain about that .
Air force, the U.S would probably be king, Infantry and Armor... highly debatable.ZZEZ wrote:So say the US armor will rape MEC armor, US airforce will rape MEC airforce and US infantry will destroy MEC infantry.
Wheres the fun in that?
There were 3 Shermans per Panzer in FH IIRC, so that kinda balanced it.youm0nt wrote:I think it's because it only needed one person to drive/fire a tank in the mod and plus the Shermans respawned quickly. Also, I think I remember the Shermans outnumbered the German tanks on each map, with a ratio, but I'm not sure...
thats exactly the solution that we need , t90s should respawn quickier than abrams and be more numerous (like if we have 4 m1a2s , mec should have 5 .) .youm0nt wrote:I think it's because it only needed one person to drive/fire a tank in the mod and plus the Shermans respawned quickly. Also, I think I remember the Shermans outnumbered the German tanks on each map, with a ratio, but I'm not sure...
I think that should be switched around, 5 M1A2s and 4 T90s (basically more M1A2 than T90). I say this because of the "sweet spot" on the Abrams tank...77SiCaRiO77 wrote:thats exactly the solution that we need , t90s should respawn quickier than abrams and be more numerous (like if we have 4 m1a2s , mec should have 5 .) .