Page 2 of 31

Posted: 2007-10-01 22:32
by Outlawz7
In BF:V you could carry more than just passengers inside a Chinook due the game engine

Posted: 2007-10-01 22:49
by Cheeseman
Which reminds me...? Why did we buy BF2 in the first place? :?
BF:V had the goodness of BF:1942 with new additions to the engine. The only improvement I see between the BF2 and BF:V engine would be the graphics improvement.

Ow yeah, nice looking Chinook; are you going to texture it yourself?

Posted: 2007-10-02 01:07
by danthemanbuddy
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:its not possible.
umm, I distinctly remember that King of Camelot came in and said with the right hard coding it could be possible. Search for "is this possible''

Posted: 2007-10-02 03:10
by Ironcomatose
NICE!! I hope to god that you or someone else finishes this up real nice so the Army can have something cool to play with instead of the Blackhawk. Not that the BH is not cool but enough it enough lol

Posted: 2007-10-02 04:40
by Trigz07
Wanna know what I wanna see. 128 players +, actually 128 players is good enough. with chinooks flying all over.... yaa

Posted: 2007-10-02 10:48
by MAINERROR
What#s the prob with the Black Hawk? It's perfect for the BF2 engine ... you can transport 8 ppl and it'S possible to mount hydras and miniguns on it.

Posted: 2007-10-02 14:18
by arjan
Black hawk sucks as it is now it think
Black hawk wont suck when it has ropes(A)
I still think its possible
Chinook would be a great addition for the US army in .7

Posted: 2007-10-02 17:53
by MAINERROR
I know ropes would be very nice but i don't think that it is possible.

There should be a DAP version of the Black Hawk especially on Kashan Desert.

Posted: 2007-10-02 19:29
by Petey
yeah speaking of guns, will the chinooks have any cool guns mounted on it? possibly a mini gun or what carebear calls a minimi

Posted: 2007-10-02 21:30
by MAINERROR
Why should it? It is a transport helo not a comabt helo.

Posted: 2007-10-02 21:34
by LtSoucy
looks great keep up the great work.

Posted: 2007-10-03 16:44
by ice_killer
MAINERROR wrote:Why should it? It is a transport helo not a comabt helo.

well the Chinook can be mountet whit 2 .30 cal MG witch are operatet by the Loadmasters :-P

Posted: 2007-10-05 16:53
by KarateDoug
Wow, hey if you could pull this one off that will be amazing. Im agine the loss if the pilot wrecks.
I mean hey you could drive tanks and jeeps into that thing.

Posted: 2007-10-05 17:13
by KP
KarateDoug wrote:Wow, hey if you could pull this one off that will be amazing. Im agine the loss if the pilot wrecks.
I mean hey you could drive tanks and jeeps into that thing.
No, we couldn't. Vehicles inside vehicles in BF2 = kaploshions :|

Posted: 2007-10-05 19:57
by Clypp
KP wrote:No, we couldn't. Vehicles inside vehicles in BF2 = kaploshions :|
But you can kludge it that within X meters of a Chinook you can request a Humvee with the T menu just like the commander requests the command truck.

Not pretty, but it would work.

Posted: 2007-10-05 19:59
by Dan UK
looking rather good gd work so far

Posted: 2007-10-06 07:08
by ice_killer
Clypp wrote:But you can kludge it that within X meters of a Chinook you can request a Humvee with the T menu just like the commander requests the command truck.

Not pretty, but it would work.


mmmmaybay doing it like the UAV shut work ? instead op seeing a UAV a chinook whit a load under its belly :-o

Posted: 2007-10-06 12:12
by ice_killer
Image