Page 2 of 2
Posted: 2007-10-30 18:41
by Brummy
I've flew some lynxes, what you can do here in PR isn't that realistic..
1. Acceleration - Way too fast, should be a lot slower..
2. Lean too much, LB, BH, etc.
3. They should 'hover' a bit easier, not that it is hard in PR, but the BH, etc. is pretty hard to keep steady.
Posted: 2007-10-30 19:03
by Wasteland
ArmA is 1000 x easier to fly helos than PR.
Are you saying ArmA is less realistic than PR? NO!!!!! IT CANNOT BE!!!!!1
Posted: 2007-10-30 19:12
by supahpingi
eh thank god for realistic chopper???
How dare u say that!!!!
Thank the devs instead
Posted: 2007-10-30 19:29
by KP
supahpingi wrote:eh thank god for realistic chopper???
How dare u say that!!!!
Thank the devs instead
Same thing, innit?
Posted: 2007-10-30 23:04
by Eddiereyes909
[R-MOD]Wasteland wrote:ArmA is 1000 x easier to fly helos than PR.
Are you saying ArmA is less realistic than PR? NO!!!!! IT CANNOT BE!!!!!1
I actually find it EXTREMELY more difficult to fly in ARMA than in PR,
Could you please PM me your configuration for the controls, please.
Posted: 2007-11-01 13:33
by BeerHunter
Foeaxe wrote: i cant really tell the differance between this and the real thing!
If you can't tell the difference might wanna talk to a real pilot.
No startup procedure , no mix controls , no torque control , no navigation instrumentation , no weather restrictions , no endless hours of flight school learning aircraft physics , no hours of training in rotary winged aircraft prior to certification , no instructor constantly criticizing your mother ..etc..etc.
Might look like the real thingy but certainly don't fly (though gotta admit the dev's did the best they could with the BF2 engine) and handle like the real thingy. :-?
or were you being facetious ?