Posted: 2006-01-02 18:17
sure ok then...
(cough)
(cough)
Project Reality Forums
Westland Lynx
Page 2 of 3
Posted: 2006-01-02 18:19
No ones even mentioned the gazelle yet. It should definately be put in.
Posted: 2006-01-02 18:21
1)
it is impossible really to have jeeps or buggies drive into the back of helicopters like in J :O . they move around until they kill you, just like in BF 1942.
2)
Westland sea king.
Falklands war.
Nuff said.
3)
I don't think 0.3 will be out for a bit, we have got quite a bit of changing going on I believe!
it is impossible really to have jeeps or buggies drive into the back of helicopters like in J :O . they move around until they kill you, just like in BF 1942.
2)
Westland sea king.
Falklands war.
Nuff said.
3)
I don't think 0.3 will be out for a bit, we have got quite a bit of changing going on I believe!
Posted: 2006-01-02 18:22
hmm that would be cool, they are probily the most useless helicopter ever though. you can kinda fly around and die or shoot some people with a GPMG maybe. I think they're only used as spotters and recon helicopters. i don't see how it could have a benificial role in BF2
Posted: 2006-01-02 18:26
mmm maybe heres a link make your own minds up,
http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/ac/ab_gzh.htm
http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/ac/ab_gzh.htm
Posted: 2006-01-02 18:28
that doesn't say anthing about anti tank, only directing such operations. I guess its closest resmbalance is the littlebird. it can carry 2/3 people.
Posted: 2006-01-02 18:50
Yeah sorry i got it wrong about the antitank, i thought it could be. Still you could have a sniper in the passengers seat. deliver him to roof tops, then pick him up again
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:09
yeah itll be a cool get around chopper.
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:18
yeah, but as long as the chinook and lynx are in i wont be to upset if its left out
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:23
yeah for sure..im looking forward to the merlin, those things are awsome.
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:30
actually, do we need the sea king if we have the merlin?
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:33
They must have solved that problem in DF :X and it was amaing you could drive your buggy in there and they would be stationary someone would fly the chinook to the enemy are you would come flying out guns blazing from your buggy.'[R-DEV wrote:Evilhomer']1)
it is impossible really to have jeeps or buggies drive into the back of helicopters like in J :O . they move around until they kill you, just like in BF 1942.
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:48
Tom#13 wrote:actually, do we need the sea king if we have the merlin?
I think yes we do
it would be great if you could land em on the water and they would float is this possible??
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:50
Well if there is anyway it could be put in it should be. It is realistic and alot of people would like to see it put in
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:51
dont use an RIB just land your chopper on the beach/in the shallows
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:53
Erm can they actually float or is it just something youd like to see?
Posted: 2006-01-02 19:58
Tom#13 wrote:Erm can they actually float or is it just something youd like to see?
yes hence the boat hull and flotation bags on th sea king and the floatation bags on the merlin also this-->
the ch53 can too.
Posted: 2006-01-02 20:21
WOW, in that case, I totally agree with u
Posted: 2006-01-02 21:20
id rather have the merlin instead of the sea king, seeing as its replacing it anyway.
and yes...please please please find a way so u can drive jeeps into merlins or chinooks and then u can drive out the back.it would actually be rediulously amazing and the assult capabilities would be awsome x
and yes...please please please find a way so u can drive jeeps into merlins or chinooks and then u can drive out the back.it would actually be rediulously amazing and the assult capabilities would be awsome x
Posted: 2006-01-02 21:25
And realistic, which is what this game is all about