Reduce LAT/HAT blast radius

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.

Should the LAT/HAT blast radius be reduced?

The LAT/HAT blast radius should be reduced.
11
17%
The LAT/HAT blast radius is fine as-is.
34
52%
The LAT/HAT blast radius should be increased.
21
32%
 
Total votes: 66

Psyko
Posts: 4466
Joined: 2008-01-03 13:34

Post by Psyko »

Rocket launchers are multipurpose tools.

they can be used in any way the wielder decides is nessesary.

If anything should be changed on these weapons, it would be the price in dollars and the amount that can be used in the time slot.
ERASERLASER
Posts: 152
Joined: 2007-12-30 14:58

Post by ERASERLASER »

Psykogundam wrote:Rocket launchers are multipurpose tools.

they can be used in any way the wielder decides is nessesary.
EXACTLY!
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

No need to mess with the rockets themselves, just tighten up access to the kits/ammo if you think they are so common that people can throw them away on single infantry, etc


The ammo system is well done at present I think, but HAT is slightly too easy maybe, by having no curve to it.
Last edited by Sabre_tooth_tigger on 2008-03-27 19:14, edited 1 time in total.
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

HellDuke wrote:So what's your problem? The L-AT and H-AT indeed can be used against infantry (just that in real life no one is stupid enough to waste such a valuable asset on 1 man).
dont know you , but if somebody is shoting at me , i will shot bak with whatever i found , expensive AT rokets included .
[T]MLPatriot
Posts: 223
Joined: 2007-09-17 14:43

Post by [T]MLPatriot »

Psykogundam wrote:Rocket launchers are multipurpose tools.

they can be used in any way the wielder decides is nessesary.
if only the TG admins could agree...
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”