Page 2 of 2
Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.
Posted: 2008-06-14 01:46
by Eddie Baker
'USMC[KILLER wrote:;700446']If anything the Marines should get a EFV in PR to replace the LAV25. Since PR is set in near-future.
EFV is not the replacement for the LAV-25, which is used for reconnaissance with a small dismount element, and in practice only holds 3-4 scouts. It's used as an APC in PR because we don't have anything else used by the Marines. The LAV family of vehicles is expected to be in service even after the EFV has been fielded.
US buying Australian submarines? You are joking, right? To all, cease and desist the prick-flag waving.
Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.
Posted: 2008-06-14 01:48
by Hotrod525
/ASF/.Venom wrote:not true, i believe the Australian Forces are..also seeing as how you just brought alot of our submarines last year i think
also about the safe gunner CROWS thing, why not just make it so you can shoot him through the front glass?
No one can challenge them... they have hundreds of billions to spend on R&D...
Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.
Posted: 2008-06-14 07:57
by KP
Less e-penises and claims, more facts, please. Eddie knows his stuff.
Re: New stuff with the US Army, etc.
Posted: 2008-06-14 08:07
by HughJass
On the stryker: Maybe instead of humvees make these the primary transport? Think about it, it would take one hit with an light AT and go down (unless you have the cage, then maybe 2) Put a tow on it (witch is an actual real life variant of it, right?) and maybe make a scout one or something (not needed, just for shits really) The chinese will be getting that vn3 with the apc cannon, and mec will be possibly getting that sexy new vodnik (im a vodnik freak, i love em) with that apc cannon (of course, if devs decide to deny this from the loving community modders
)