Page 2 of 3
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-13 21:34
by jOHNNYdOUBE
Get 3 gigs of ram and you then cannot ask for more.
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-13 21:42
by Outlawz7
jOHNNYdOUBE wrote:Get 3 gigs of ram and you then cannot ask for more.
Well I have 3 Gb and you still have FPS of 2000 while I get 400.
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-13 21:51
by CodeRedFox
2000 FPS vs 400 FPS
You guys are spoiled LOL
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-14 09:18
by General Dragosh
i'lol'd
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-14 10:04
by AnRK
Yeah my graphics card is an old crappy Radeon X850 and PR runs smooth as a babys arse now I have 4 gig, XP doesn't even recognise .75 ish gig of it either.
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-14 19:51
by SuperTimo
Outlawz wrote:Well I have 3 Gb and you still have FPS of 2000 while I get 400.
christ 200fps i stuggle to get above 45 on most maps... on fools i stuggle to get past 14 in some parts

Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-14 20:15
by ChaosSound
I don't get it how people are doing so well on FPS opn anygame I play I can never get above 50 and i have a pretty good system
Nvidia 8600GTS
2gig of ram
2 cpus running at 2.80GHz each
and I still have to run everything on medium with no AA or else I fucking can't play.
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:22
by morfumax
i get an average of 30 fps

Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-14 21:25
by Rudd
ChaosSound wrote:I don't get it how people are doing so well on FPS opn anygame I play I can never get above 50 and i have a pretty good system
Nvidia 8600GTS
2gig of ram
2 cpus running at 2.80GHz each
and I still have to run everything on medium with no AA or else I fucking can't play.
I have a worse system and get a better FPS?!
I'm looking forward to the new effects by R-CON Alex and various other community modders such as the modder working on the HAT flame effects.
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-14 23:13
by Ryan3215
lol, i used to play on an old ATI radeon 9800XT but a couple weeks ago it died on me. so now im getting an nvidia gefore 6*** (idk which number it is) but long story short: my computer sucks. i hope this game doesnt get too dependant on graphics or RAM.
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-14 23:31
by gclark03
Why don't you just go for an 8600GT or a 7 series?
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-15 01:54
by Deadfast
AGP?
And I imagine his CPU might be a problem as well

.
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-15 02:17
by M_Striker
To be honest, I think the graphics in BF2 look better than in PR, even though it is the same engine...

??:
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-15 11:29
by V4.SKUNK
gclark03 wrote:Why don't you just go for an 8600GT or a 7 series?
I wouldn't get an 8600GT, the 7600GT is actually faster and cheaper..
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-15 11:31
by hall0
V4.SKUNK wrote:I wouldn't get an 8600GT, the 7600GT is actually faster and cheaper..
Realy? Thought its the other way around

Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-15 21:53
by space
Ive got an 8600GT - Its silent - ( no fan ) and I run everything on high at 1280*1024 under vista - not bad for £50. Because I was so impressed and theyre so cheap, I got another one to run Sli - It didnt work so it ended up on ebay :/
Edit - actually I just remembered - I dropped dynamic shadows and lighting to medium to improve performance on one or two maps
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-16 01:31
by Jimmy_Smack
Some significant texture optimization would be nice in the next release. PR has gotten to the point where I refer to it as a "combat sim" so I don't care too much for textures anymore. Only thing that bothers me is frame drop when looking certain directions on certain maps.
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-16 03:25
by Nadokings
I run my BF2 and PR on max settings (including res) and honestly PR looks a lot better than vanilla bf2, can it even be improved more??
Re: 0.8 and graphics
Posted: 2008-06-16 08:29
by bosco_
Nadokings wrote:I run my BF2 and PR on max settings (including res) and honestly PR looks a lot better than vanilla bf2, can it even be improved more??

To back up your argument
