I'm on NATO 2 not 1, and I don't really care if you guys ended up winning the whole tourney to be honest, I had fun. My point at least, is basically that Temple is a bit of a pointless flag. Trenches has those arty pieces and a bit of an ammo dump, otherwise I'd say the same for that too. Personally if it's going to be kept, I think North Bridge and Temple should be on the same level on the AAS system. Then balance the Chinese flags round that. Like Johnny said, it doesn't make much sense for the Brits to have to go there fist.
Plenty of people rush Temple, if I play PLA I always do it, if I play Brits I always expect it incase it happens. I don't really see it as in anyway invalid, just good pre-emption
No need for the smacktalk anyway Melscaldrav, it's very childish.
OGT:- British Spawn
-
Viper5
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18
Re: OGT:- British Spawn
Leave tournament sentiments out of the discussion, or Masaq will hunt you down.
-
Sabre_tooth_tigger
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14
Re: OGT:- British Spawn
Temple is a built up area & it has a walled perimeter so its a valid location for a base of power/bunker, etc I think
I like the idea of grouping north bridge and temple together in the aas. I think the original idea was to avoid a stalemate
I like the idea of grouping north bridge and temple together in the aas. I think the original idea was to avoid a stalemate
-
Viper5
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18
Re: OGT:- British Spawn
Suggestions have emerged from both sides as a result of battle outcomes. The point is, this is not the Tournament forums, and thus it is irrelevant. Either post on the merits of the suggestion, or dont post at all.MaxBoZ wrote:You know i was right..




