Project Reality Forums

There is a High Quality SS thread too, check that out

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f10-pr ... shots.html

http://screenshot.xfire.com/screenshot/ ... aca48b.png

1680*1050 maxed out 8xA

http://screenshot.xfire.com/screenshot/ ... 20b79f.png
http://screenshot.xfire.com/screenshot/ ... 2bdf03.png

maxed out ect, but dunno if its 1680*1050, dont think it is.

[R-PUB]bosco, the last tank picture is awesome <3

I play with 1600x1200 with everything on high but I dont use AA. I could but I dont think its nessecery on moving images and when someone drops a jdam or theres alot of smoke the fps would suffer and I hate dying because of low fps

Ive just uploaded the originals in the original size from my screenshot directory, so just average shots. The ka50 is a model test on a bf2 map









During the fools road match mentioned above I took a screenshot every 60 seconds throughout the entire match and uploaded it somewhere, that would have been all in high res also

'[R-DEV wrote:Undies;760328']


Taken on the Fools Road ap when we had the big multi clan game on there a few months back.

I like that one, looks like World in Conflict.

Sorry they aren't 1680x1050. These are 1600x900 but I usually play 1680x1050 same settings.



Sorry if they take a while to load. I forgot they were BMPs.

edit: YAR! They aren't even the right res..damn you imageshack! Damn you!

Ecko wrote:Because BF2 maps were designed with older PC's in mind. PR pushed the limits hence your PC struggles, mine does too to be fair. For the most part RAM should fix your problem. I know it's the only reason I can't handle some maps.

isnt 2 gigs enough!?!?!??!

i have a ge force 7300 gt w/ like 512 mb..or what ever the higher memory is

and idk how to find out what processor i have..but i still have to run pr on mostly meduim..the only high thing is geo and distance..res highest

Small but nifty pics, I nicked one for my sig if thats ok

Sabre_tooth_tigger wrote:

ewwww look at that vbf2 camo

1600x1200 AA-x8 ingame
the 1st one has Adaptive AA turned out,not sure if there is much
difference.

What a screenshot doesn't render is the quality of the animations effects in High Settings ...
And when I am playing PR that is the only thing I can't set to low or middle settings !
PR with low res. settings and PR with high res. settings are 2 diferent games !
As I got a "prehistoric" CPU, what I have made is 3 accounts with 3 diferents graphic settings, and when I want to join a laggy map like Fools Road (due to the number of objects ...) I use the low one (like when I play matches) and when I just want to enjoy the game, I use the "high settings" one ! The other one is a compromize between the 2.
And it's true, I am not playing the same with the 3 differents accounts !

Fools road on high is just awsome!

gazzthompson wrote:http://screenshot.xfire.com/screenshot/ ... aca48b.png

1680*1050 maxed out 8xA

http://screenshot.xfire.com/screenshot/ ... 20b79f.png
http://screenshot.xfire.com/screenshot/ ... 2bdf03.png

maxed out ect, but dunno if its 1680*1050, dont think it is.

Well on your screen i don't see any Anti-aliasing the screens are nice but no AA.

Mora wrote:Well on your screen i don't see any Anti-aliasing the screens are nice but no AA.

strange, i have 8x AA