Project Reality Forums

3 ftw, militia in urban area = win.

Ghost1800 wrote:My vote goes for 3. I'd love to see some urban fights with the militia equipment.

What he said.

ahhhhh... I luv militia maps.

Candidate 3, Militia in Urban as others have said.

yay... glad u decided for map 2. Finally a map where militia (a non coaltion force) ATTACKS!

2 or 3. Bith would be epic. 4 is too much like muttrah, would seem like a copy.

3 my chice

welcome back irontaxi
anything you will do will turn out fine

Candidate 3, interesting harbor design plus FIBUA, pure win.

'[R-DEV wrote:IronTaxi;812971']SO.... here they are...

I already chose one.. BUT...

which would you choose?


candidate 1?


Candidate 2?


Candidate 3?


Candidate 4?

If you are after a coastal map with forests and a port to defend then image 2 or image 4 are the best and I would opt for image 2.

1 or 4

3 has too much industryal area and 4 has almost nothing.


I stay between 1 and 2. A littler more to 1 than 2.

Uphill fights can go unbalanced very quick! I think Ill go with candidat 4

All sounds good.. i hope you get to make the Hill map idea one day.. i really like the sound of that!

3 looks too similar with Muttrah. I like 4

1 looks really nice like the layout, and a good mix of city to open land and water, would make for some intresting tacitcs and firefights.
2 looks good, apart from a lot of open dockard, not many buildings
I think that 3 has too much city in it, nice to have some city and open land
the layout of the land and city in 4 is nice, I like the industrial look, but its too small for my liking.

so all in all 1 gets my vote.

I would go for no. 2. I like this harbour lay-out the best!