Page 2 of 2
Re: Land Rover Replacement?
Posted: 2008-10-07 02:34
by Ecko
The main problem with the landy atm is that on all the maps it's on there is always a far better vehicle to use in the role of fire support. Imagine basra with only jeeps and with no RPGs, the landy would be used more in it's RL role.
Re: Land Rover Replacement?
Posted: 2008-10-08 11:12
by browna3
never ever replace the landy. if you do i will stop playing pr. change it for the snatch landrover

you can place a 50 cal on top, but dont stress your self to do it, stick with the landy you got now
Re: Land Rover Replacement?
Posted: 2008-10-09 04:53
by Wh33lman
Then I guess all the things I've heard about Land Rovers and Humvees is just propaganda. Like how a Land Rover broken down on the side of the road is nothing new(i love how they cough and sputter in PR thought) and that during the first gulf war, Where the Humvee made its first combat appearance, the soldiers played a game in the bogs to see who could get a Humvee stuck. A game which no one ever won. And that the Humvee is easy to modify, haveing dozens of different variations. Dont get me wrong, im sure that the Land Rover has done something somewhere at some point it time, but right now its just fodder for insurgent RPG's.
Re: Land Rover Replacement?
Posted: 2008-10-09 06:39
by Scot
Wh33lman wrote: during the first gulf war, Where the Humvee made its first combat appearance, the soldiers played a game in the bogs to see who could get a Humvee stuck.
Orly?

Re: Land Rover Replacement?
Posted: 2008-10-09 08:07
by Wh33lman
the picture was unnessary. this has turned from a request to replace the Land Rover into and argument ove which is better, the Land Rover or the Humvee
Re: Land Rover Replacement?
Posted: 2008-10-09 09:28
by Jigsaw
Lmao at the picture scot666, I think this is less a matter of personal preference and more a matter of national preference.
Re: Land Rover Replacement?
Posted: 2008-10-09 11:09
by Eddie Baker
Ditch the versus ****.
This thread has run its course.