Project Reality Forums

I think this one used to be on oman




The A10 is USI?

Dirtboy wrote:Ok guys, lets be serious.

As of right now, Project reality has enough assets as is. Do we really want more "goodies" for people to fight over? If we add more stuff like this, than no one will ever do infantry.

That being said, I think that these models are beautiful and we put together well. My hats off to the USI guys.

Dirt

I'm still missing my Arty pieces, so yeah, I want more goodies

my answer to that is take out the fighting assets then... have certain maps designed plainly for infantry and only have big load transport choppers like the chinook.

if you take out fighters then people will only use infantry..

hellbounde wrote:my answer to that is take out the fighting assets then... have certain maps designed plainly for infantry and only have big load transport choppers like the chinook.

if you take out fighters then people will only use infantry..

16 player layers for maps only have transport stuff. and "big load transport" in bf2 you can only have 8 people per asset

/offtopic this page is scary, when i open this page it seems their are creepy jungle sounds

arjan wrote:/offtopic this page is scary, when i open this page it seems their are creepy jungle sounds

That's because of an awful advert for some crappy game, this ad image has sounds built in that I fully object to.

I didn't want to use ad-blocker but the ad you're referring to drove me to use it. (although I'll still be donating to the site soon, removing the ads isn't the only reason to do that. )

ontopic:

The US have lots of new toys and decent models that have replaced the vBF2 ones, it's mainly China that's in need of new toys.. PR is fortunate enough to have one hell of a dedicated team of Devs and contributors that have done some awesome work, once PR is finished, USI'll probably be after all of PRs models.

I think MEC should get the ....



(Sorry Masaq, couldn't resist )

lolz!

Does USI have any Lap tops or rados we can use?

Sabre_tooth_tigger wrote:I think this one used to be on oman




The A10 is USI?

Actually thats greasy mullet.

black-wolf wrote:Wasnt the T-72 used?
(I got a feeling I'm really going to be pwn3d because of this post, lol)

T-72/Lion of Babylon, T-62 & T55M. Basically the whole range of post 1945 Soviet battle tanks apart that were available for export apart from the T-54 (AFIK the T-64 & T-80 were never exported during the Soviet era, and if they were, definetly not outside the Warsaw Pact). They all got pwnt by allied armour and airpower for very few losses in the end, but they were "Monkey Model" export variants.

That Large battle in Irak where US Armoured Units whit some British Tanks faced the Uber T-72 or the Irak MBT's. The US Got a few Losses when the Losses for Saddam was TOTAL. None for the Challenger's

torenico wrote:That Large battle in Irak where US Armoured Units whit some British Tanks faced the Uber T-72 or the Irak MBT's. The US Got a few Losses when the Losses for Saddam was TOTAL. None for the Challenger's

An Abrams has never been destroyed through enemy fire.